this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
148 points (91.6% liked)

News

23267 readers
3342 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why is Softbank involved in so many business investments that go sour? I've lost track of the number of articles I've read that go something like, "Softbank invests in X. X's value is tumbling."

[–] Addv4@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think a lot of the issue is that softbank had the idea of if they can invest a bit and get a good amount of growth, how about they invest a ton more from the outset and "guarentee" insane growth. They did that with a few startups and it worked, then they did it with WeWork and it spectacularly backfired. The basic premise of WeWork was pretty sound until the real estate market started going up in price, which kind of blew up the margins that WeWork lived in. That and a frankly financially crazy CEO kind of ruined it.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

WeWork never made much sense. The entire business is just co-working spaces and regular office space rental. There's nothing special about it at all.

[–] RivenRise@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the special part was having smaller rental spaces and that feeling of having coworkers in an office that weren't actually your coworkers. I used to deliver to a lot of we work and we work type places and I sort of got the appeal for startups. Some definitely didn't have privacy like another commenter mentioned.

[–] Introversion@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In the beginning, WeWork definitely was about renting to smaller companies (or individuals) at reasonable prices, providing decent (if not upscale) accomodations. That’s probably a decent little business.

But their CEO had (or at least, promoted) delusions about WeWork providing a fundamentally different experience. Some of those delusions were IIRC software projects he claimed would allow renters to automate and improve their network and electricity use. He sold this bullshit on talk shows, and gave this as a reason that WeWork wasn’t just another renter of office space. In reality, they didn’t have the expertise to do anything like he claimed, and it all came to nought.

Maybe if he hadn’t been spending money like a fleet of drunken sailors, much of it on himself or vanity projects, they might’ve not cratered as badly, or at least as quickly.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And that's a perfectly reasonable business, but nothing revolutionary.

If their business would have been co-working franchises, in the sense that you can have an office everywhere and with some set standards, it could even have been a good business. But it's low-margin, nothing like Google or Facebook.

[–] Introversion@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Totally. But Adam Neumann wasn’t going to settle for “low-margin”, nosirree! Low margins don’t buy you jets and mansions.

[–] 4am@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

No no; you see - it was in the cloud.

That means it should be patentable and it will provide 38% returns over four years. Trust me, bro.

[–] mindbleach@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Y'know, there was this documentary with Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder...

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks to Elon I misread your comment for a bit

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

flawed investment philosophy?