this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
90 points (88.8% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2393 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON, May 18 (Reuters) - Several top White House aides say they are confident protests across U.S. college campuses against Israel's offensive in Gaza will not translate into significantly fewer votes for Joe Biden in November's election, despite polls showing many Democrats are deeply unhappy about the president's policy on the war.

The White House optimism on the issue, which is shared by many in the Biden campaign, runs contrary to dire warnings from some Democratic strategists and youth organizers who warn misjudging the situation could cost Biden votes in a tight race with Republican rival Donald Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It reminds me of the Star Trek TOS episode "City On The Edge of Forever."

When McCoy goes back in time to the 1930s he changes the future and ends the Federation. When Kirk and Spock go back they discover that a rising anti-war sentiment would lead to America staying out of WW2, allowing the Nazis to take control of the world.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I had to look up the date of TOS it aired 1966–1969 during the Vietnam war.

The lesson to be learnt here is that stopping the Vietnam war meant the Nazis would take over the world.

The anti-war sentiment won in 1973. That is year the Nazis and communists took over America and the whole world.

And that's all the fault of college kids protesting against the Vietnam war.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So, you don't know the difference between "1930" and "1970."

You don't know who was fighting in the Vietnam War.

Maybe, just maybe, instead of looking up the dates of old TV shows, you should read some actual history and basic math books?

https://bookshop.org/p/books/a-young-people-s-history-of-the-united-states-revised-and-updated-howard-zinn/18074845?ean=9781644212516

https://bookshop.org/p/books/math-made-easy-brain-based-learning-elementary-and-middle-school-math-james-paicopolos/15984839?ean=9798585055546

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I am substituting the Nazis for the Soviets as an example.

In 1970 the argument was that if America pulled out of Vietnam the commies would take over the world.

For every time 1930 is used as an excuse to promote war, a lot of pointless wars have been lost without dr. Evil taking over the world.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's like saying because Jack the Ripper stabbed people no surgery should ever be allowed.

There were plenty of people who were against America getting into WW1 who turned around years later and pushed for war in 1930.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That’s like saying because Jack the Ripper stabbed people no surgery should ever be allowed.

No, that's an entirely different episode of Star Trek.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

[long ]

When they started making '2001:A Space Odyssey" they planned on making the Mysterious Object a glowing diamond, as in the original short story.

They couldn't make the diamond work, so they put black tape over the diamond in all the story boards. The tape was a placeholder for the time when they figured out what would be a really good Mysteriosu Object.

One day, someone looked at the storyboard and said that maybe they should just just the black slab.

Years pass, and all the viewers come up with theory after theory about what the Monolith is supposed to be. A book? A tombstone? A doorway?

One day, a young fan comes to Arthur Clarke and tells Clarke that he knows the secret. The ratio of the rectangle is 1 : 4 : 9, the squares of the first three numbers. Clarke loves it and puts it in the next book in the series.

The point of the story is that I could have pretended that I made that commnet without thinking about the Jack The Ripper episode. I didn't and so I pass on the coveted No Prize.

https://en.wikid.org/Marvel_No-Prize