this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
538 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59629 readers
2866 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 221 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Recall won't take snapshots of [...] DRM-protected content.

At least the movie industry will survive this unscathed. Thanks Microsoft. 👍

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I guess im gonna have bee movie playing on a loop as my desktop background.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago
[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

If its processed locally and sent nowhere, why is this a concern? Unless otherwise.

Edit: I phrased it wrong. If MS claims its processed locally, and is like a second eye, why they would provide an exception to DRM contents. This could mean that some data might get sent to MS servers and transfer of DRM content is banned, this poses a legal risk. Who knows.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because I absolutely do not trust microsoft to not have some information going back to a server somewhere.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I think you've misunderstood the comment above. They're asking why snapshotting DRM-protected content would be a problem if everything stays local, implying that since it's a problem it does not stay local

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Oh yes my bad, brilliant point

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 13 points 6 months ago

The non-fun answer is that they're most likely just using the default screenshot mechanism, which already blocks that. Other programs like KeePassXC, which also hides itself from screenshots and recordings (unless allowed) will probably not be included either.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

locally until the next automatic update.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

KeepassXC seems to register as DRM protected content (I think...) for me, kills moonlight streams while it's up so at the very least using a password manager (which you already should be using) would be protected?

I already daily drive debian on my lab computer and laptop, guest I'll be swapping my desktop over in the not to distant future...