this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
55 points (83.1% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2416 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Joe Biden’s campaign is facing a strategic dilemma. Since the president’s job-approval ratings have been consistently low, his path to reelection depends on making 2024 a comparative choice between himself and Donald Trump, his scary, extremist predecessor. That task is becoming more urgent as evidence emerges that a sizable number of voters either don’t remember or misremember the four turbulent years of the Trump administration. But paradoxically, educating voters about the potential consequences of a Biden defeat could annoy and alienate them by pushing Trump fatigue to new heights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Biden's campaign has a "complicit in genocide" problem

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Trump won't have that problem because he won't care how complicit he is.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean you are correct.

Trumps voters don't care if he is complicit in a genocide.

Bidens voters do care if he is complicit in a genocide.

Its apples and oranges. The two cohorts of voters are looking for different things from their candidates. Its why comparing the two with each others yard-sticks doesn't make sense.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Definitely. Trump's eligibility doesn't depend on people thinking he's a genocidal piece of shit. If anything, it improves his chances.

Biden doesn't have that luxury, though. Hence why it's a problem.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's a problem because liberal voters expect a perfect candidate, but conservatives are willing to see the forest through the trees.

Biden's being held to a standard that no one's holding Trump to.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's a pretty big leap between "perfect candidate" and "unapologetically commiting genocide".

The reason why no one is holding Trump to Biden's starddards is that Biden wants votes from people who aren't the scum of the Earth, since that's already Trump's entire electorate.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

unapologetically commiting genocide

Which is not what Biden's doing and you know it. Why even put that out there?

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's exactly what he's doing, why are you pretending is not?

If he says "sorry for the genocide" I'll stand corrected and change it to "apologetically committing genocide"

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sending US troops to build a pier to provide aid is committing genocide?

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Now that's what I call arguing in bad faith by feigning ignorance 2024 greatest hits

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Humor me, pretend it's not feigning ignorance and explain it. What's Biden doing that rises to the level of genocide?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How is that a problem for Biden? When Biden criticize aspects of Israeli behavior, and Trump has zero problems supporting Israel no matter what.
Biden is for sure the lesser evil in this aspect too, where he is probably most criticized by people attempting to make both sides equal, when it's a false equivalence of gigantic proportions.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, he is the lesser evil.

Some people don't like evil and won't vote for him until he decides to not do that. That's a problem for his eligibility.

It's a lot easier to convince one guy to chill on doing genocide than convincing a million people that it's ok to do genocide just this time cause it's important and the other guy is worse

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

OK so 70 years of supporting Israel, and suddenly NOW it becomes a problem in the election?
It has absolutely nothing to do with Russian/GOP propaganda to make Biden look bad?
I'm sorry, I just don't buy that. I'm all for a solution in Gaza, and I'm sure Biden is too, on the other hand, I don't believe Trump gives a shit.

[–] juicy 6 points 6 months ago

Israel has always been a bad actor, but the current gencocide is clearly a low point. And thanks to social media, the mainstream media's consent generation machinery is losing effectiveness. It's hard to pretend nothing is happening when people see emaciated children on their instagram feeds. Biden doesn't need any help making himself look like a sick monster.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I love that I saw this exact argument 4 years ago when he picked Harris as VP. "oh so now police violence is a problem, damn you, Putin"

I don't know why it took until they killed >10000 children in 6 months for more people to care, but supporting Israel has always been a problem. If his election is threatened by that he can simply stop supporting a genocide or admit that, yes, his belief in letting Israel kill as many people as they want is more important than this election.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If police violence is a problem, that too is 100% a reason to NOT vote for Trump. Trump wants to give more power to police, and protect them even better when they kill innocent people. Trump wants police to shoot colored people and demonstrants indiscriminately. His policies and actions clearly show that.
You are supporting a fascist with no regard for democracy, either on purpose or unwittingly.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Phew, I'm glad I'm not voting for Trump.

Can we discuss how Biden's support of genocide is bad now?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

If you are not helping Biden, you are helping Trump win. That's the problem with the 2 party system in USA.
Maybe one day USA will have a better democracy, and we can have more nuanced debates on US politics.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Get a clue as to how fptp voting works.