this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
705 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3553 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 107 points 5 months ago (6 children)

People that wanted vertical tabs must be really excited

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 57 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Anything to fill all that absolute wasted space from every website formatting things to fit phones and not desktops. Ultra wide really sucks ass for a lot of things.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

IMO that's mostly a window-management problem, not an app layout problem. The point of an ultra wide monitor setup (other than flight sims or something) is to be able to view a bunch of different things side-by-side.

Edit: speaking of which, now that we've come almost full-circle from no tab support, to multiple tabs in the same process, to one process per tab, it seems to me that tabs themselves ought to be part of the window decoration, not the app. I mean, they're useful for almost everything you might want to have multiples of (editors, file managers, terminals, etc.) so why force every app maker to implement them over and over again?

[–] madis@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

tabs themselves ought to be part of the window decoration, not the app

Well, Windows did try that. It sounds cool as an idea, but it also severely limits what the tabs can do, as most programs don't need tabs that are as advanced as browsers', and even browsers' implementations of tabs vary widely.

Exactly. I have an ultrawide at work, and I just have three things open side-by-side. I have a dual-monitor setup at home, and I have two things on the larger one (27") one and one on the other (24"). My workflow is nearly equivalent between them, the main difference is bezels.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 7 points 5 months ago

To be honest, it's not just for phones. The wider the monitor, the more I'd need to move my head if a website uses the whole space, instead of keeping it centered. Obviously it shouldn't be too slim but you can't really just fill an entire monitor or align your content to the left of the screen anymore nowadays.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Its honestly the only reason i use brave and edge over Firefox. Can fully commit to FF now.

[–] yildolw@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The TreeStyleTab extension for Firefox has added vertical tabs for a decade

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The way tree style tabs worked after they broke it was never very good. Floorp is what to use if you wanted side tabs on Firefox.

That said I still went back to Vivaldi after trying to use Floorp because of stupid little ux issues like pinned tabs not being protected from closing, and broken session saving.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sidebery is a very good implementation of the vertical tab panel

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

The issue is that because they broke the UI customization that allowed for it all the extensions are just a kludge to add a panel to the side without actually getting rid of the top tabs.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but you have to have a custom user.js file or whatever to remove the tabs on top.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Ok, so do that once and you're done. :)

It should be an option in the UI though.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It removes the close/maximize/minimize buttons though. Not ideal.

I remember back in the day (FF 4?) I had the window buttons, tabs, back/forward, URL bar, etc all on one row, which was pretty cool. So it was something like this, from left to right:

  1. Firefox menu - was Firefox, but now would be the hamberger menu
  2. back/forward buttons
  3. extension butons
  4. URL bar
  5. tabs

It worked pretty well. It would be nice to do that again.

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is avoidable with the right CSS.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure you're right lol I just don't know it and its more work than it needs to be.

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

That it is. Firefox updates have broken my CSS several times now, so I am quite happy for them to add side tab officially.

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

I have been running vertical tabs for a while now and it's broken about 3 times, once every few months. Currently, I've had no min/maximise/close buttons for about a week because I can't be bothered to fix it. Far from "one and done".

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

I admit, this news has made me add a note to re-download firefox on my work machine...

[–] krash@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

I am, specially after seeing how well it was implemented in the nightly version. It can't be compared to an extension that enables the same capability.

[–] spiderman@ani.social 1 points 5 months ago

would be cool if it's smooth like how arc does it, would instantly switch back to Firefox if they manage that. arc is still buggy on many things or when i use some websites.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Anyone who really cared was already using an extension that did these things.

[–] mke@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

That's unnecessarily dismissive. Unfortunately, even the best extensions have their downsides. Some used a browser that suited their preferences better instead, which is a shame for both Firefox and the user, in my opinion.

Mozilla recognizes this and is finally taking action to integrate highly requested features into Firefox. Many "who really care" are glad for this, because it is a good thing.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago

What's extra funny is that those extensions are made by Mozilla already

At least tab grouping and vert tabs were last I looked