this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
99 points (87.2% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2286 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 46 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The white house won't even admit it's a genocide. There is no red line and never will be.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Well, no western country has either.

Here is the list in case anyone is interested:

  1. Bolivia
  2. Brazil
  3. Colombia
  4. Egypt
  5. Jordan
  6. Malaysia
  7. Namibia
  8. Pakistan
  9. South Africa
  10. Turkey
[–] livus@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think you might be missing a few. Eg Nicaragua, Maldives.

In terms of the West, Ireland, Spain, and Norway are probably close to openly calling it a genocide.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In terms of the West, Ireland, Spain, and Norway are probably close to openly calling it a genocide.

It's getting so bad that even white heads of state are considering calling it the genocide it is.

[–] livus@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago

Yes, sooner or later it will be recognised by most.

I'm old enough to remember the years after the Cambodian Genocide when the US supported the genocidal Khmer Rouge being the representatives for Cambodia at the UN, locking out the actual government of Cambodia.

These travesties happen every so often.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, no western country has either.

So? Does that make continuing to enable genocide right? Is that some sort of fucking justification? If not, why bring it up? "Everyone else is doing it" is another shitty excuse, and the fourth I've seen here on lemmy. The other three, summarized:

"That's the way we've always done it;" "We might be called antisemitic by the party that chants 'Jews will not replace us';" and "Trump loves it so that makes it ok."

This is what I mean about support for genocide on lemmy. Making shit excuses for it instead of condemning it.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

No. Just stop. You see something you don’t like and you make up a bunch of other subtext.

What we need LESS of is people acting like the US is the only country with power.

My comment is a lot more educational than you want to admit. A lot of people probably needed to know that the list of countries is small. Not because “genocide good,” but because those people probably thought the list was a lot longer—and they should be concerned about it.

I guarantee you couldn’t rattle off that list. All you know is USA USA USA USA.

That’s the problem with social media. You’re not here to fight genocide, you’re here to abuse people, and chase them into the far right wing with your false accusations.

[–] juicy -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Please stop acting like the US isn't the 500 lb gorilla in international politics

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is a significant lack of humanity among every member of UN right now. All 193 member countries should be ashamed of their silence. Don’t let 192 of them off the hook because of one.

[–] juicy 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I think if we could get the low hanging fruit, the smaller countries without much in the game, to declare it genocide, that would put pressure on the larger countries.

Some interesting info:

To pass a resolution in the United Nations General Assembly, a simple majority of the members present and voting is required. With 193 member states, this would generally mean at least 97 votes in favor, assuming all members are present and voting.

Just 97 countries is all it would take to get that ball rolling. Screw the US, put pressure on Guatemala! Work from the bottom up.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

and chase them into the far right wing with your false accusations.

If you're going to be a trump supporter because I dared to suggest that you quit making shit excuses for genocide, you were already a trump supporter.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I know. That's why you keep trying to justify support for genocide with excuses.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That’s not what’s going on, and you know it. You’re just trying to make me feel bad by gaslighting me. It won’t work, because I know what you’re doing.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That’s not what’s going on, and you know it.

"Everybody's doing it" is an excuse.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m not saying that. You’re angry I want to be mad at ALL the 193 UN countries ignoring genocide and not just my own.

All we would need is 97 of them for a majority vote to pass a resolution. Why does the US even matter at that point?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The US is my country, and it being a democracy and me being a citizen, the only one for which I bear any responsibility.

Though it's probably easier to get 97 nations to oppose genocide than to convince Joe Biden to.

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Yeah yeah Biden Biden. Whatever. Want to do real good instead of zero good? Convince people in other countries, who could swing, to fight, and help them…. With your dollars. That might actually buy more than some tour busses and staff lunches.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Biden said there’s a red line of Rafah is invaded. So Israel does airstrikes in Rafah and says they don’t count as in invasion. Bigger airstrikes with dozens dead and charred victims. Biden says they don’t count. The red line becomes squiggles and dotted line and neither says the line was crossed.

Today Israel sent TANKS into Rafah. Still think this doesn’t count as in invasion?