this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
635 points (96.1% liked)

Political Memes

5408 readers
5127 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
635
"we" the "people" (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 

no one fucking told me about states banning RCV during all that yapping on here about how i should VOTE THIRD PARTY OR ELSE IM COMPLICIT in the DNCs CRIMES

it may or may not be joever, very blackpilled at this moment

edit it’s actually 10 states. 5 in the past two months.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (5 children)

States have banned ranked choice voting??? wtf why???

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 64 points 5 months ago (2 children)

ostensible answer:

“We believe in the one person, one vote system of elections that our country was founded upon,” Missouri state Sen. Ben Brown, the ballot measure’s sponsor, said in an interview.

Brown and other critics of ranked choice voting contend the system is confusing, and he said there are numerous instances in which voters didn’t end up ranking their choices.

real answer: republicans don’t win as much when rcv is in place.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I hate slogans like "one person, one vote" or "innocent until proven guilty" because so many people treat them as principles in themselves rather catchy names for principles that are much more nuanced than those names suggest. It doesn't matter how many "votes" a person has the ability to cast so long as everyone is given an equally opportunity to influence the outcome of an election.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Another one I hate is "Let me ask a simple yes or no question:" Proceeds to ask a very complex question with a lot of nuance

Then, when the person tries to clarify the person asking just says "I just want a yes or a no."

Both parties do it, and it's just scoring political points every time.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Yes as long as it isnt one person 8 votes another person 9. Although, the electoral college somewhat is that anyway... A vote in one state is not equivalent to a vote in another.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

To paraphrase Reservoir Dogs: Senator Brown sounds an awful lot like Senator Shit..

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because it’s progress. Shockingly, the five states that have banned it are red.

[–] choco_crispies@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

All ten states that have banned it are red, and the ones that have it on the upcoming ballot are as well.

https://www.npr.org/2024/06/05/nx-s1-4969563/ranked-choice-voting-bans

Edit: added link

[–] Paprika@lemmy.cafe 25 points 5 months ago

Because with ranked choice people can vote for Jane the Socialist but also pencil in a secondary, begrudging vote for Joe Biden. They want lefties to split their vote. They want a vote for the Greens to be a loss for the Democrats. Ranked choice kind of negates that.

[–] hannes3120@feddit.de 12 points 5 months ago

If you can rank your votes and have multiple options available you actually have to stand for something in order for people to vote for you.

Being against another party is not enough in such a system since there are more options available.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Can you guess which party that holds a tenuous grasp over their constituents via fear would not want them having the option of voting for other people that might more closely align with their ideals and morals?

I mean, technically it's both parties at this point, but Republicans know that RCV will be the absolute death of the current version of their party which has devolved into little more than a reactionary ultranationalist faction.