this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
759 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2198 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Why the fuck is Trump even able to run? He's literally a fucking criminal, and was impeached. I dont understand how our political system or even judicial systems work at this point.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 78 points 5 months ago (23 children)

Disclaimer: Fuck Trump.

That being said, convicted "criminals" should still be able to run for any public office in my opinion. A tyrant CAN capture the judiciary and imprison their political opponents. This is in fact what happened in the Indian elections right now. This is in fact what happened in the US elections in the early 1900s, where a socialist candidate ran for President from prison. What was his crime? Striking when the State had deemed it illegal to do so.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Happened in Brazil too in 2016. Corrupt prosecutor (now congressman) worked with corrupt judge (who later became justice minister and is currently a senator) to imprison Lula. He couldn't run for the presidency and Bolsonaro got it. Later, the Supreme Court found that the case was based on lies and there were coordination between the prosecutor and the judge and they reinstated Lula's freedom and political rights.

But now, the tables have turned, and after Bolsonaro's actions in the failed coup on 2022, the Supreme Court took away Bolsonaro's political rights and he can't be a candidates for any office until 2030.

[–] VoilaChihuahua@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I'd like it if anyone convicted of fraud / criminal deceit / murder could never be president, but as our nation's common sense appears to have withered and died, the intent would eventually be twisted to suit some nefarious purpose.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] myrmidex@slrpnk.net 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Funny how 8 years ago, people kept saying "don't worry about Trump, there are checks and balances in place". None of that talk this time around!

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because there's now an infrastructure built up around him with plans on how to override those checks and balances (Project 2025).

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

We also saw the checks and balances do fuckall because they were captured by fellow criminals.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Those people never realized their stance is just as idiotic as "I cross the street without looking both ways because if they run me over, they'll have to pay"... or "I have the seat belt on, I can crash at top speed and nothing will happen to me"

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thought leaders have been raising this issue for years. Among those calling for barring criminals from running for office: some guy named Donald Trump.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Shouldn't you have the right to run for office when you have paid back your debt to society?

I mean if you can get an opponent convicted and it prevents them running, it feels kind of undemocratic.

BTW I'm not talking about tRump, he should be behind bars since ages already.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Yeah probably. The same logic ought to be applied to felons who currently lose their right to vote. Rights being treated as privileges...

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago

I'm pretty sure the last guy to run for office from a cell was a socialist.

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago (11 children)

There are no hard requirements for being president beyond those listed in the Constitution:

  1. Be a natural born US citizen
  2. Be at least 35 years old
  3. Have resided in the US for 14 or more years.

That's it. The framers of the Constitution presumably felt being a convicted felon would be enough for an electorate (or the electoral college, at least) to simply not vote for that person.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

also this prevents a rogue prosecutor and judge from convicting a presidential candidate and blocking them from running. this way it is up to the people, whether the conviction is legitimate or not.

to be clear i am not saying trump’s conviction is illegitimate, just speaking generally. i could definitely see a world where trump pushes for this with a Democrat candidate (remember all the “lock her up” stuff?). i hope the legal system is robust enough to appeal a rogue situation but at some point it may not be.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago (5 children)

He IS a felon. But while he went through the impeachment process several times, he was never convicted. And there is no rule or law that says a felon can't be president.

While voting for Trump, or even entertaining his views, is a red flag warning. Like it or not, he is legally entitled to run. Perhaps the rules and laws should be changed. But to do that would require either a unified congress or a super majority of a party willing to do so. And I suspect, that as it currently stands, neither side wants to limit themselves from gaining the power and status of national or state office brings to them for any reason.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is by design. So you can't just get some charges on your opponent and disqualify them

[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

By the same logic felons should be allowed to vote. Instead you got the war on drugs

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

The serious argument about felons being allowed to vote is that voting is a civic duty, and you want felons to re-integrate into society. If they have tons of restrictions following them around for the rest of their lives, they're always going to be a little bit outside. Feeling like they're stuck outside of society makes recidivism rates higher, so restoring the right to vote is an important step in rehabilitation.

It would take a lot of people having felony convictions to be able to seriously sway an election, but given the racially polarized way that the criminal justice system is often applied, I think that's probably happened.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wait, Trump isn't allowed to vote now? Lol if true.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Oh, I whole heartily agree. There is a lot tit for tat in politics. And rules are meant to be bent and twisted to one's own end. It could end up being a slippery slope as easily as not.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Technically he is not a felon until he is sentenced. So he will be a felon on July 11th.

That said I agree not letting people run from office because of convictions just incentives the state to go after political enemies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Why the fuck is Trump even able to run?

Because nobody is actually stopping him. Republican state level leaders all love him. Dems are too terrified to threaten him with more than a wrist slap. The police are in his corner. Big Business is bankrolling him. The Media keeps accidentally falling face first onto his dick. And 1:3 Americans still insist he's better than The Other Guy.

So he's still listed on all the ballots. He's still the GOP's nominee. And if he wins the lion's share of electoral college votes (by hook or by crook) he's going to be the President in January.

[–] theonyltruemupf@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago

In Germany, if you're in jail you can't be elected into office. You can however always cast your vote even from jail (except for rare and extreme political crimes such as terrorism, starting a war and such)

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I dont understand how our political system or even judicial systems work at this point.

With a lot of grease.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Note: "grease" is old slang for money.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I prefer "kabloingie", personally.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

This is how the constitution is written. This scenario was never foreseen and our founders were naive.