this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
342 points (87.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

29793 readers
968 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 47 points 5 months ago (5 children)

It's not really that I interpret it in another way, but I never really thought about the structure of the word πŸ˜…

[–] db2@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Go further. For example, people say 'gypped' without knowing it's a pejorative reference to the word 'Gypsy' which is itself a pejorative of the Romani.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My favorite recently is sophist from the pejorative Platonic definition. It really puts words like sophisticated in a different etymological light and subtle contextual meaning.

[–] Caboose12000@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophist_(dialogue)

Fake but convincing by argument, gaslighting, etc., generally by someone in a position like a professor, a judge, or a politician.

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 0 points 5 months ago

And the Egyptians, too!

[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I remember learning this about 20ish years ago and telling my then-sister in law about it when I explained why I wasn't going to use it anymore. I got told I had a stick up my ass, and this was by a marginalized (gay, immigrant) woman. (Somewhat unrelated note - very grateful she's a former relation.)

So glad people have been learning and I've been hearing "gypped" less and less in recent years.

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Some words have simply entered common use and become decoupled from their former meaning. Maybe your acquaintance was right.

[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Watching my own language means my "acquaintance" was right? I don't think I'm the one with a stick, if that's the case.

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 0 points 5 months ago

Seems like Orwell was right

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’ve had similar realizations about words like β€œacross” and β€œagain”.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I get "across", but what about again?

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

A gain. In addition to.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

β€œA gain” as in one more. Gain meaning β€œan increase in amount”

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, actually I had never thought about the structure of the word either. Thanks for the great shower thought!

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I've definitely had a similar feeling with band names and brand names, etc. You're just so used to hearing them that they are their own thing without being the component words that the name contains.