this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
112 points (95.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13461 readers
813 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Huldra@hexbear.net 84 points 3 months ago (21 children)

That doesn't make any sense, the law "recognizing" certain relationships isn't the same as purely acknowledging the existence and possibility of them for the purpose of laws like if there is a law against cheating on a partner.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 56 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Yeah is there some kind of trap card thing in Chinese law where as soon as a court recognizes that two women had a relationship it immediately makes gay marriage legal?

[–] Huldra@hexbear.net 21 points 3 months ago

I was thinking what if the law is written so it only applies if the cheating couple could get married after causing a divorce, which would be an extremely funny way to word a law like this.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)