this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
1232 points (98.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26848 readers
4032 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What ? No, it's 3 2 4 1

If you're talking chronological that is

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This diagram helps to show that you and Hadriscus agree on the order of the posts, but not on how to describe it. That's pretty interesting to me.

  • 4, 2, 1, 3 -- labeling the posts from top to bottom with which order they should then be read. So the first post is read forth, the second post is read second, etc.)
  • 3, 2, 4, 1 -- listing the order that the posts should be read if they were understood to be labelled in 1-4 top-down. So we should read the third post first, the second post second, forth post third, ...
[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The fact that we have gotten this confused is all the evidence I need to change how this works.

Simplest solution is to change the layout from:

  1. Profile
  2. Attachments /screenshots / replies
  3. Text

To

  1. Attachments /screenshots / replies
  2. Text
  3. Profile
[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

The fact that neither can agree on how to describe it yet agreeing on what is so wrong in the first place is just an additional data point on how stupid Twitter numbering is. I find that fascinating.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

hhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnn

You're right

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Exactly haha, they are both arguing the same point because they used different numbering scheme!

[–] LPodyssey07@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

@Hadriscus@lemm.ee

  • if you assign a number 1-4 from top to bottom, reading order is then the indices 3, 2, 4, 1

  • alternatively, if you assign 4, 2, 1, 3 to each element top to bottom, reading order is then 1, 2, 3, 4

different algorithms, same result. i had chatgpt help me out with some fancy ass notation for those interested:

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Instructions unclear, dick caught in semi-colon.