this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
711 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

5377 readers
1134 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
711
Goofy stuff like this gives the neighborhood some character (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corroded@lemmy.world 60 points 5 months ago (4 children)

She's fighting with the city over this? What city had rules for how you can decorate your property? I can see a draconian HOA having an issue with this, but I was under the impression the city never cares unless there's a code violation.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Depending on the city they can be every bit as petty. Especially small towns that want to appear higher class than they are.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

And the trashier a town is the more likely it is to have weird ordinances from back when they were trying to keep the trash out that they selectively enforce now.

Source: I came from a trashy small town.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My hometown has city ordinance over fences. They have a max height and need to not block the view of the houses too much. It's in place to keep the welcoming feel of the town iirc. So yeah depending on the place the city could be getting involved directly

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'd fight that. Surely there's a fourth amendment argument there (e.g. I need it to be high enough that police looking over it would constitute an illegal search).

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My city limits fence heights, but the limit is 1.8m. a cop would need to be pretty tall to see over

Anyway, if you want more height you could grow a hedge. Also if you don't like the setback rules, a hedge can regain all the lost front yard

We have a fair few hedges.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

I happen to be 1.9m or so, so a 1.8m fence wouldn't do much to prevent me from looking over since that's right about my eye level. So I'd opt for the hedge.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

iirc one american city tried to jail a dude because he "wouldn't" (couldn't as he was old af and broke) mow his lawn.

I dont think he went to jail but it was taken to court