this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
546 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3657 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 129 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Or...

The president can just order the DOJ to imprison him for actions against the US government and outright treason.

And it would be totally legal

But he won't, because he doesn't take the threat of fascism serious.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Joe Biden is acting like a complete pussy following milquetoast Merrick’s lead

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 16 points 2 months ago

"Nothing will fundamentally change."

[–] ProIsh@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Toss him in jail for one day and you'd see all this shit stop.

Add the owner of fox in the same cell. You'd be amazed how quickly things would clean themselves up.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Took one bullet to stop 1/6.

Fascists are usually cowards, but they'll always keep pushing till there's consequences.

Biden will not fucking give them consequences. They gave him the power to, and dude immediately announced publicly that he'd never do it.

Like, that alone should be disqualifying.

Biden treats this personal, it's him vs trump. But this is so much bigger and so much more important than either of those old rich men.

[–] ProIsh@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Yup. I keep drifting back to RGB and how much she screwed us. (obv it's Republicans fault in the end, but she could have played that a bit different)

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Bullies on a bigger scale

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You'll have to extract Rupert Murdoch from Australia.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure we could find some Australians willing to hand him over

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Any not in his pay

Tbh I expect they’d thank us if we set ST6 on him like bin Laden. Genuinely, Murdoch has had just as profound and negative of an effect on society, but also enriched himself enormously in the process. Dude is one evil motherfucker.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe the recent court ruling would actually allow that because suspending court justices isn't a regular part of the president's duty.

The best king example I've seen is that the president would be within the law if they shot the director of homeland security - the president is allowed to control who is in that position, they can remove them at will - the SC ruling means that the method they chose to remove that person is now unimpeachable... if they chose to suspend them by freeing them of their mortal coil they're "acting within official duties".

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t believe the recent court ruling would actually allow that because suspending court justices isn’t a regular part of the president’s duty.

Directing the DOJ is

So Biden can direct them to arrest someone, and throw them in gitmo.

His motivations can't be investigated. And directing the DOJ is within a presidents power

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It might be illegal for the DOJ personnel to follow that order, but he can just tell them he'll pardon them for any crimes they're charged with for following his order and that he'll murder them if they don't follow his order, and all of that is totally legal

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

It might be illegal

But we'll never know, because looking into his motivations is literally forbidden.

All he can be tried for is the action in a vacuum. And if it was explicitly within his powers. He's good

Literally anything that goes thru an agency is automatically cool.

That's why it's so dangerous to half ass this election and for Biden to just ignore all the power he has.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The president can pardon people for unspecified things (proven by Trump). He can pardon anyone for "following orders"

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

If he cared about protecting the country from fascism, he wouldn’t be running.