this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
653 points (96.4% liked)

Fuck AI

1419 readers
521 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I feel like #3 shows up for every tech innovation. I remember people bitching about the Internet not being viable because phone lines were too slow. The demand needs to be there before the infrastructure will get built.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Some difference in that fixing the power capacity problem will absolutely mean combusting more hydrocarbons in practical terms, something we can ill afford to do right now. Until we get our legs under us with non carbon based energy generation, we should at least not take on huge power burdens.

Now there was an alleged breakthrough that might make LLMs less energy hogs but I haven't seen it discussed much to know if it is promising or a bust. Either way power efficiency might come as a way to save #3.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

You're absolutely right that AI is going to use electricity, and (for now) a majority of that electricity is generated through combustion.

I don't think that is the concern when it comes to the power grid. I think most people are worried about power delivery infrastructure, which is a lot harder to upgrade/add than power generation infrastructure. Sorry if my comment wasn't clear about this.