this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
660 points (94.4% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3595 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I keep seeing the argument that going up against the government is the only reason anyone would own an AR-15.

But, call me crazy, there are just oodles of white supremacist civilians running around. Do you think there is no possible scenario where good, ordinary people might have to defend their loved ones against those kinds of shitheels? Do you think such a fight is unwinnable, or immoral? Do you think it's more or less likely than columns of tanks and missiles flying into houses on American soil?

Because I think the scenario you outlined is ridiculous. But even if it happens, unwinnable fights must still be fought. You can't just roll over belly up for tyranny.

What are YOU gonna do if Trump wins and becomes a tyrant?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

See, you had a good argument and then you veered into martyrdom ideology. At any rate there's plenty of weapons you can use to defend yourself that aren't semi-automatic rifles with external magazines. Like Semi Automatic rifles with internal clips, or revolver rifles, or shotguns, or semi-automatic pistols in a brace, or baseball bats and 50 good friends, or a nice bit of Tannerite buried on the driveway with steel balls imbedded in it. The list goes on.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're right, it's stupid and immoral to use the best tools for the job. The right thing to do under tyranny is to hobble your ability to fight.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No the right thing to do is to not have the fight in the first place because we all actually got our shit together. Having the fight at all is a failure that's at least as likely to balkanize this country as it is to result in one side winning.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Fantastic! I'm glad you have figured out how to change the minds of fascists, as a pacifist. Please hurry, we are short on time.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

When you look at polling and history it's obvious that most people, even most people voting for Trump aren't fascists. They simply don't believe Trump is actually that bad. The mission is not to give a flower to a fascist. It's to get photographed doing so in order to show everyone else the picture.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well why wait then? If they're just the good Germans why aren't you already blowing things up? After all that means you're the French resistance right?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You don't even know what the good Germans were, do you?

They were people who thought that Hitler wasn't really all that bad. They were just nice people who didn't want to cause a fuss.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lmao. And referencing the French resistance made you think I wasn't aware?

We can't just ignore Trump's voters.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck are you even talking about?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Actually avoiding the worst case scenario. Keeping our democracy and not having a dictator.