this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
652 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3724 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) announced Wednesday that there are currently enough votes in the Senate to suspend the filibuster to codify Roe v. Wade and abortion rights if Democrats win control of the House and keep the Senate and White House.

“We will suspend the filibuster. We have the votes for that on Roe v. Wade,” Warren said on ABC’s “The View.”

She said if Democrats control the White House and both chambers of Congress in 2025, “the first vote Democrats will take in the Senate, the first substantive vote, will be to make Roe v. Wade law of the land again in America.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do you propose house and senate democrats should have legalized marijuana over the past 4 years? Fucking magic?

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I’m saying Mr. Schumer has lied and said “soon” over two dozen times in the last 4 years. Ask Chuck, why don’t you?

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If anyone else heard him parrot that repeatedly as you claim, maybe it would be worth an ask.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This article isn't about legalizing marijuana, but rather allowing federal banking for weed sales amongst other things. The bill in question doesn't address marijuana legalization. The only other article you linked was from over 3 years ago. So you posted two articles, about how Schumer keeps saying 'soon' like it's something that happens frequently, and one isn't even about legalization at all.

More importantly than that though, is Schumer is the senate majority leader, which means even if he puts that up for a vote, and even if there was enough support, it means fuck all because the house hasn't and won't pass it.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

He’s been saying “soon” since 2021 at least. The article from 2021 supports this precisely, using his own words, which is exactly why I linked it.

I follow a marijuana subreddit where his nickname is Chuck ‘Sooner’ because of his empty promises since 2020.

I understand your larger logic points about passing legislation. My point, however, is using the word “soon” to string along a faction of voters, dangling the carrot.

I don’t believe any support I offer will matter to one who argues disingenuously, however.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You provided two examples. One wasn't relevant to your point, and the other was a single example from 3 years ago.

As mentioned, he's in the Senate, so anything he tries to pass without the house means nothing. It's not disingenuous arguing, you've just provided shit examples.

It's neat that you are part of an echo chamber that has a cute nickname for Chuck though.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Great.

Earth to Bassturd— my point is they are his words and his empty promises.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Do some research, troll elsewhere please and thank you

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You said Schumer has said "soon" more than two dozen times over the last four years. You provided one example from three years ago. By your count there are more than 24 other times he has said this. This isn't trolling. This is calling out bullshit when I see it.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nice last try though. Good day sir.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Lol. Byeeeeeee.