this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22845 readers
416 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's also the fact that most of Paul's odder statements, like banning women from leadership, are not by him at all. Only about half his epistles are actually by him or his immediate inner circle.

FWIW, I don't think Paul was a grifter, I think he was a former grifter who became a sincere convert after some weird shit happened to him, and unfortunately like Evrart in Disco Elysium he was just so slimy it drips off him onto the page.

[โ€“] context@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

personally i think the line between grifter and sincere convert is also quite blurry for this kind of thing. if someone's paycheck depends upon a particular belief, in due time they'll come to believe it sincerely. and then yeah, there's paul and there's the early paulist counterrevolutionary faction.