this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
168 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19229 readers
2360 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think she'll end up governing like Obama.

Lots of progressive talk and it'll sound amazing, but not really accomplish enough.

Which I mean, it's the best we had since Obama... We just have to be loud early that we get a real competitive primary next year. Not some bullshit where no one runs or everyone drops 24hr before Super Tuesday and endorses the party favorite.

Historically for Dems we get the best turnout after competitive primaries. And the worst when voters feel they have no say in it.

We need to look at the primary as an advertisement for the eventual candidate. That's the whole point, getting out there and selling your plans to the people.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Obama tried to accomplish a lot of progressive stuff, but Congress held him back from a lot of what he really wanted to do.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 20 points 4 months ago

He also kneecapped himself by trying to work with the GOP when they made it clear they were unwilling to negotiate in good faith

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Obama tried to pretend to be a progressive while accomplishing as little progression as possible.

Worked really well seeing comments about him. Apparently acting is more important than actions. Don't forget to thank Obama for not codifying abortion rights..

[–] Waveform@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I remember watching the news closely during his presidency, to hear what he had to say about the Dakota Access Pipeline and ensuing protests, and there was nothing. So, some weeks back I searched to see if there was anything I missed, and I found one instance of a person asking him about it, and he gave only generic responses. Like it was new info to him. Blew me away, because to me it was the most important topic around that time along with what we were doing/going to do in Syria. I don't have a high opinion of the man, nor the system that makes people like him a figurehead.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Most people including those on Lemmy only care about appearances and acting skills of politicians. They are far too stupid to look at the actual actions of politicians.

[–] Waveform@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Eh, I think it's impossible to accurately judge a person's entire intelligence, whether it be by the comments they make online or by their behavior irl. To me, 'idiot' is a bad word, worse than most.

That said, it does seem like people are too quick to believe the lies spouted by politicians. I suppose they will continue to believe them until said politicians' policies affect them in a negative way (e.g. suddenly finding themselves homeless, which is a reality for more and more people these days).

[–] finley@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

Must be nice, not having a memory