this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
728 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2966 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So there is a really real discussion within the Federal Government if Trump supporters in the Govt should be subject to a security review to have their clearances revoked for Anti-American sentiments and activities.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait. Hold on a fucking minute.

I cant even have a security review to have clearance before I get a job that requires it (and then what happens if you don't?) but these people aren't even reviewed?

Fuck, you want to talk about compromised information, that's a fuckload of security risks

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Review used to be every five to ten years, but the Biden Administration changed it to five last year for all clearances. What's being discussed is if MAGA supporters should be reviewed deeper as they are a threat to National Security. Generally speaking how someone votes has not been an issue for clearance unless you were a member of the Communist party. The problem now is that being a member of the Republican Party doesn't mean you support Trump but if you do support him you lable yourself as a threat. It's a slippery slope. Security clearance checks scan your entire internet history going back seven years. We are seeing clearances denied due to Xbox conservations, loads for social media comments. The Security form you fill out requires you list every online handle you used over the last seven years. To not list one would be a criminal offense. So it's become a problem that MAGA is running into, their online history is creating red flags. The discussion is do they start treating MAGA like Communists and blanket ban them from public service.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

every online handle over 7 years?

oh well, guess I'm really not going into DoD work now. I probably have a dozen or so that I don't even have the username saved for.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that was new to the form. They review your finances, every location you traveled, every address you lived at, interview neighbors, coworkers, they will pull logs from social media like FB, Twitter, Reddit, Playstation and Xbox, the pull phone records and GPS data, text records, ISP records, etc. That is why people with a TS clearance should not be on social media at all. That form gives the Federal Government full access to your entire history for that seven year period to determine if you are trustworthy.

For a normal security clearance they don't go as deep, usually just financial and review for any police reports, but all give the govt the right to search everything if need be.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

to determine if you are trustworthy

Yeah I don't even trust myself that much

[–] Zoboomafoo@yiffit.net 6 points 1 year ago

I can't guarantee I haven't made politically spicy comments in the last 7 years and I'm usually a "trust the system" liberal

[–] oce@jlai.lu 0 points 1 year ago

This level of transparency is dystopian.