this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
864 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4297 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 257 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Urgh, articles about tweets.

“So think of it: They get me to that position, and then their campaign says, ‘I’m the prosecutor, and he is the convicted felon.’ That’s their campaign,” Trump said. “I don’t think people are going to buy it.”

"We approve this message"

That's it. Don't reward a newssite for this shit.

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 72 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'd rather more people rewarded the news site for it then rewarding twitter by going there directly

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I took one for the team and went to the article, so no-one else had to.

[–] ordinary_dad@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I approve your effort.

[–] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

This just rewards both of them, because the embedded Twitter elements are still there

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Eh, it was pretty funny though. And it's a complete character change from Biden's campaign.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How quickly people forget the Dark Brandon clapbacks

[–] suction@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They didn’t seem too successful in the news cycle. I still think it would be worth a try if Harris only referred to Trump as “the convicted pedophile”. Like, 1-up the orange Mussolini at his own stupid tactics.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I still think it would be worth a try if Harris only referred to Trump as “the convicted pedophile”.

He hasn't been convicted of being a pedophile yet. Best we can do without walking the line as regards defamation is something like "convicted felon, found liable for rape, GOOD FRIEND of Epstein who is currently fighting for your vote because it's the only real chance he has to escape the law and he knows it."

[–] suction@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

But he’s convicted and a pedophile, why do we have to do it by the book if he wins by making up whatever he wants, was my point.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

her clip is pretty good though:

Trump: And then their campaign says I’m the prosecutor, and he is the convicted felon-[CUT] Harris; "I am Kamala Harris and I approve this message"

it's a nice truncation.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately tweets by famous people are news, whether we like it or not. At least this way I don’t give Elon a page view.