this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
289 points (96.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7205 readers
281 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, that's the point, Bill!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InternetUser2012 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I would really like to see our supreme court filled with neutral people. Someone that will side with the law, not religion, not party lines. It's really what we should have but clowns are going to clown.

[–] ouRKaoS 20 points 3 months ago

That's the way judges are supposed to be, just not how it works in reality.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Problem is that the law itself is partisan, because it was dictated by the wealthy at gunpoint

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

In theory that's how it works already. In practice, there is currently no disadvantage to appointing partisan judges and no system in which to objectively measure partisanship of a candidate. What that means is that there will always be partisan parties appointing partisan judges and there will always be candidates who claimed to be neutral who will be either accused of or proven to be partisan anyway.

In the current system true neutrality on the bench does not exist

[–] InternetUser2012 1 points 3 months ago

Pretty easy to find out if they're religious though. Getting rid of that would help quite a bit. A system to hold them accountable for being asshats would be great too.