194

If you are keeping score at home, you have surely noticed that the two most important defense officials in Benjamin Netanyahu’s war cabinet — Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and the former military chief of staff Benny Gantz — warned last week that Netanyahu is leading Israel into a disastrous abyss by refusing to present any plan for non-Hamas Palestinians to govern Gaza and appears to be contemplating a long-term Israeli military occupation of Gaza instead. Gantz said he would leave the government if there was no plan by June 8.

===

“Netanyahu’s acquiescence to the extreme right, Smotrich and Ben-Gvir, has generally been seen as motivated out of his need to keep his coalition together and himself out of jail,” Friedman told me. “Now it seems that he has willingly sold his soul to the extreme right. One explanation is that the extreme religious right projects a Messianic image onto him that corresponds with his own sense of having been called to save Israel and the Jewish people. He has a plan for the day after and it’s very clear to anyone who listens: ‘Total victory’ — and eventually the return of Jewish settlement there. Israel is on the way to reoccupying Gaza.”

If that happens, Israel will become an international pariah and Jewish institutions everywhere will be torn between Jews who will feel the need to defend Israel — right or wrong — and those who, with their kids, will find it indefensible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Make no mistake, Bibi is doing all of this knowing that a Trump victory will give him the carte blanche permission he needs to annex Gaza, and so the political damage this is doing to Biden is just icing on the cake. He has made this much clear by inviting Trump's lackeys to peacock for the Knesset. Friedman isn't alone in thinking that Biden's playing checkers while Bibi is playing chess, but even if Biden made a 180 and took a hard stance against what's happening, two things would be virtually guaranteed:

  1. He would be ruthlessly lambasted as an antisemite by the AIPAC-endorsed left and all of the right, and lose the Jewish vote in every swing state, handing the election to Trump in a landslide.

  2. Bibi would ignore him just like he ignored the Israeli left, the Supreme Court, and now his own Defense Minister.

This is looking more and more like an Iranian masterclass in subterfuge which began during the Obama years, and which Trump unwittingly supercharged.


Edit to Add

This piece really puts a very complicated, multi-decade process into much clearer focus. For anyone who's been flabbergasted at how awful this situation is, and who suspects that there's something deeper and more sinister going on, these are the major points that have been highlighted behind the paywall:

  1. Why did Israel/Bibi secretly help fund Hamas for all those years? Because it destabilized Gaza and made a 2-state solution less likely.

  2. Why did Hamas act so brazenly if they were so militarily outgunned? If they knew the reaction would be disproportionate? Because they weren't calling the shots, and they were useful pawns for Iran.

  3. Why has the reaction been so unreasonably bloodthirsty? Because Bibi is facing possible jail time and knows a strong alliance with the bloodthirsty far-right is his only means to avoid it. Their votes are all that's keeping him a free man.

  4. Why does Biden trust Netanyahu so much? Even after his lurch to the right and during a staggering onslaught of civilians? Because he knows AIPAC will sink his reelection if he takes a stand, and the risk of nuclear war will rise considerably if he loses.

  5. Why has Netanyahu flatly refused to negotiate with Abbas and the Fatah-led PA? Why does there seem to be no "what's next" plan? Because the far-right wants to annex Gaza, not coexist with the Palestinians. The Supreme Court tried to get them to stop the annexation of the West Bank, and Bibi's far-right coalition neutered the Court in response.

  6. Why are US politicians so blind to all of this? Many of them are too old to have seen the ground shift beneath them, and don't see the Israel you and I see.

  7. Why is Netanyahu kissing Trump's ass? Because Iran is days/weeks away from becoming a nuclear power, and he thinks Trump is willing to nuke them to stop it.

None of this timeline could play out if Bibi willingly negotiated a post-Hamas ruling coalition. He won't stop the onslaught because his far-right cohorts have already decided that the end game is complete annexation of disputed territory, and Iran has forced them into that corner because they knew Bibi's coalition was dumb enough to go full bore. This ends with complete isolation of Israel on the world's stage one way or another, and all Iran had to do was fund a small band of murderous ideologues for a few decades to set the stage for a final showdown.

We are weeks/months away from a nuclear standoff in the middle east.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

So Biden is essentially a dead man walking? No matter how much it terrifies me, I just don't see him winning through all these disputes while the right is unified. This is exactly what they needed, and the right is exactly what Israel needs. What are we to do, the American People, when we're caught in the crossfire?

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

My friend, I wish I knew. The more I learn about this timeline, the darker our future becomes. There's a reason Putin, Bibi, and the Ayatollah all have their pedals to the metal right now, and it's not because they sense that America is on the up and up.

If what seems likely comes to pass, by next January Project 2025 will begin the wholesale dismantling of our federal bureaucracy, Republicans will hold the Senate, Trump will lay out the red carpet for Putin to attack NATO by refusing to honor Article 5, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito will orchestrate their successors, abortion will be banned at 12 weeks nationwide, Obergefell will be overturned, and future US elections will not run the way they've been run before. If we have a legitimate chance of winning the Oval Office in 2028, I'll be absolutely shocked. None of this is outlandish or far-fetched, and people have bragged openly about most of it.

For what it's worth, the far left is absolutely correct. It's a genocide, and we're complicit. We've funded too many genocides in the past for this to be ok in any way, shape, or form. But also, the center-left is absolutely correct. It's a multi-polar world now, and Bibi already has the blank check he needs. If Biden backs down, he'll be slaughtered at the polls. What comes after will absolutely be worse.

One of the reasons Hitler was able to do what he did was that the far-left KPD turned on the center-left SPD under the banner of "anti-fascism". The SPD tried to unify with the KPD after the elections of 1930, but the deal was rejected. The KPD routinely got about 10% of the German vote in the Weimar Republic. In 1933 the Nazis came to power and banned the KPD on day one. Then they blamed the KPD for the Reichstag fire, and suspended civil liberties in response. The Weimar Republic collapsed, and the rest is history.

If the far left and the center left can't find commonality under a shared vision for the future, I think we're all about to be fed to the wolves.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 1 month ago

The more I learn about this timeline, the darker our future becomes.

Oh man that's a statement that just barely scratches the surface.

As someone that has bounced around from politics, to advanced earth sciences, to the arts and now just keeps learning new things because I can't help it... Yeah, things aren't looking so good.

Humans will prevail and all that but we are slamming head first into a wall of spikes that is going to be and already is starting to be a giant crushing destructionary force for all of what we think of as normal.

Everyone hates the people calling for change when they feel comfortable where it is but if you are calling for change to go backwards to when you felt even more comfortable somehow that always wins, and we go barreling towards fascism from it.


Come senators, congressmen, please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway, don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt will be he who has stalled
The battle outside ragin'
Will soon shake your windows and rattle your walls
For the times, they are a-changin'

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The first cause of the left must always be domestic anti fascism. Not out of a nationalistic sense, but out of raw practicality. When fascists gain power everything else we believe in is thrown away

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What are we to do?

Vote for Biden. He’s no guarantee for the Palestinians, that is true. The alternative is confirmed annihilation of Palestinians and Ukrainians, as well as occupation of Taiwan.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 1 month ago

He would be ruthlessly lambasted as an antisemite by the AIPAC-endorsed left and all of the right, and lose the Jewish vote in every swing state, handing the election to Trump in a landslide.

Instead, he's getting ruthlessly lambasted as a genocider by significant Muslim populations in swing states, losing their vote, and handing the election to Trump in the Electoral College.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yep, so now you see why he's not budging. He loses either way. My guess is he's trying to thread the needle by counting on the Jewish, pro-Israel voting block being more valuable (i.e. larger) than the pro-Palestine left wing. Could also be that he knows Trump presents an existential crisis not just for everyone on the left, but also for many center-right voters who are already talking about swinging for Biden. He might (or might not) have good reason to. More likely, I think, he's counting on the fact that young people care more about Gaza than old people, and young people consistently have the lowest turnout of any age group. It's a hedge, to be sure, but apparently one they think they have to make.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 1 month ago

And in the meantime children die. What a stupid world.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I didn't say it was fair or good. Just that this is the situation we find ourselves in.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 1 month ago

I know enough history to be used to not being able to vote not to kill children.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

If I were presented with a choice to murder a child to avoid 100% certain nuclear Armageddon, I would murder the child. If I were presented with a choice to murder a child to avoid 1% certain nuclear Armageddon, I probably wouldn't. Where the rest of us fall between those extremes is up for debate, and it seems to me like that's how the administration is rationalizing it. Apparently to them the stakes (for the whole world) are just too high to change course.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 0 points 1 month ago

I’d kill a kid to save an undetermined amount of people, but I would have the decency to kill myself as well

this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
194 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18059 readers
3056 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS