128
submitted 9 months ago by tintory@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

How generous of them.. my European coworkers used to take a month off every year around August, and we think we're being generous with a couple of days.

[-] 1984 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

When I take a sick day in Sweden, it's not counted as vacation. It's a sick day and I get 80% of my salary when being sick as well (every day after the first day of being sick).

Life is pretty good in that way.

[-] joostjakob@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

That's just paid leave. You get as many sick days...as you are, you know, sick.

Well, to be honest, there are some limits in place for long term sickness

[-] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago

This is some late stage capitalism shit. Oh how generous we are, we allow you to be sick up to 5 days a year.

In my job in Europe, I get unlimited sick days as anyone should. If it’s long term, after the first year out, my salary drops from 100% to 70% for another year. Then the government takes over. And no, people do not abuse this system.

Also, obviously this is separate from my 30 days PTO.

The US needs to wake up!

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I was sick pretty bad at the beginning of the year. Out a week and some days and all my sick days were used with half of my PTO. All because I got sick at the fucking work place.

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

The bill offers employers flexibility in accruing sick leave. However, by the 200th day of employment, it should amount to five days.

This is not enough, but it’s a start I guess.

At my company we tried to negotiate for paid sick leave on top of our meager Paid Time Off (no current distinction) and corporate basically laughed at us. This shit needs to not be optional, and not just in California. Everybody gets sick and/or needs to take care of someone who’s sick. Ignoring that basic fact of life is absurd and inhumane.

[-] tintory@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago
[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

Corporations are already upset about the push to pay existing workers more money. To have much more paid time off means they'd have to hire more workers to cover those (already run lean) shifts, AND pay them leave time too. Think of the profit loss!

[-] tintory@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

You mean a decease in Profit Margins

There profits will increase because more people have more money to spend and time to spend that money

[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

Ha, you're right, and isn't it ironic that doing the better thing for everyone ends up being more profitable? It's almost like they aren't concerned with the actual value that's lost, but more the difference between them and everyone else.

[-] tintory@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Right!!!!!

It’s almost always about the abuse of power than the acquisition of wealth itself

[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Back on Reddit I had a very old post reply saved from someone who through his work and connections had an inside view of the "wealthy", and they broke down the change from money to power as one goes from "just" millionaire to higher up. When money becomes no longer a concern, or rather when obtaining "stuff" (as Carlin would say) is no longer a factor, how much power and influence becomes more of a way to compare one's wealth to another. It may not even be important anymore on net value if one has a bigger leverage arm on things.

[-] tintory@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

That’s spot on, and a lot their resistance to any sort of regulation is more out of distaste that the lessers put rules on them and it’s their right to abuse others and the environment

Progress can’t be made without that understanding

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Gosh, five whole days!

Well, at least it's something. Looks like Lena Gonzalez is a Democrat. The cons are always going on about the "forgotten man", gee, I wonder - does this help that forgotten man more than, say, endless "investigations" into Hunter Biden revenge porn? What about holding up military promotions because you are doing performative nonsense for forced birthers?

The right is always hypocritically going on about the "forgotten man"; I think the left should remind them about what is really going on.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
128 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18073 readers
2939 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS