220
submitted 9 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Trump's attorneys say Judge Tanya Chutkan has made statements that "create a perception of prejudgment."

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 131 points 9 months ago

Well, to Trump any black woman ~~speaking facts out loud~~ is a problem.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

update from the judge

lol at that whole second half warning

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 24 points 9 months ago

Defense counsel should probably remember that after a certain number of improper actions, they'll be defending their status to stand before the bar as well as defending Trump.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 8 points 9 months ago

Let’s be honest, that’s what we’re all hoping for.

[-] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

Look, we've never seen someone try to get out of trial so much they get a default judgement in two different states, causing them a judgement of ~1.5 billion dollars. They certainly didn't have a lawyer who thinks dropping his pants and saying the nword is a funny standuo bit, and no one has told him Grape Job Norm.

Said lawyer also didn't decide to defend Proud Boys and lose said case as well. So not following the rules and doing whatever you think is established precedence that works, imo.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

You could also cross out either black or woman from that sentence and it will still ring true for him. Take your pick.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 113 points 9 months ago

He stinks of desperation. Fucking traitor.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 48 points 9 months ago

He wrote himself a pardon he can’t use. Watch for everyone trying to squirm and make this a federal case - those are the ones with pocket pardons.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 96 points 9 months ago

It's not like she accepted a vacation on a private yacht or hunting lodge.

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 8 points 9 months ago

That one goes in the pros column I'm pretty sure.

[-] Rusticus@lemmy.world 87 points 9 months ago

Of course he didn't ask the judge assigned to his case that HE APPOINTED to recuse herself.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 22 points 9 months ago

That's because anyone who agrees with him isn't biased. Duh.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

trump logic.

[-] Tillyrblue@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Obama appointed her not Trump

Edit: Misread the comment, I’m dumb

[-] demlet@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I think they're talking about a different trial. There are so many.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Not dumb just hard to keep track of which legal case is being seen by which judge.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I can't believe a fucking ex-President has so many on-going criminal cases that we get confused over them... and that he's still a front runner to be nominated again.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

And that’s all those indictments are a selling point to his base, because they see it as proof of him being unfairly persecuted and not properly prosecuted.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It seems to me that if he's being "UnFaIrLy PrOsEcUtEd" that he could easily find a crack team of high-powered lawyers who would fall over themselves to defend a former president from unjust legal action.

But he can't.

[-] bogo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

They're talking about Cannon. Re-read what they wrote. It was missing a /s

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 76 points 9 months ago

"This was nothing less than an attempt to violently overthrow the government, the legally, lawfully, peacefully elected government, by individuals who were mad that their guy lost," Chutkan said during one October 2022 hearing, later adding, "it's blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day." (my emphasis)

"The people who exhorted you and encouraged you and rallied you to go and take action and to fight have not been charged," Chutkan said during Palmer's December 2021 sentencing hearing.

Those are simple statements of fact.

Trump's attorneys have indicated they may seek removal to federal court in another of his cases, in which he's charged alongside 18 co-defendants in Fulton County, Georgia, for allegedly orchestrating a "criminal enterprise" to thwart the 2020 election results in battleground state.

Judge Jones' ruling denying Meadows' motion to remove makes it absolutely clear that none of these Georgia defendants meet the "low bar" for federal protection from State prosecution for performing their federal duties. Why? Because interfering in a State election is not a federal duty.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 55 points 9 months ago

Your honor, we object to factual statements.

[-] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 26 points 9 months ago

Typical GOP playbook: Shatter all norms/precedents/ethics to supplant their own agenda/power, but then cry bloody murder when an opponent approaches even a modicum of doing the same.

[-] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

On what grounds? That she might find him guilty?

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

BECAUSE IT'S DEVASTATING TO MY CASE!

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

It's because she isn't white and is from another country.

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

..and upon his conviction, this will be submitted as grounds for appeal. It will never ever end for Trump.

[-] Ejh3k@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

I wish trump would recuse himself of life.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

It's too bad Harlan Crow only allows one black person in his life. If this judge was a friend of his, Trump wouldn't have asked that.

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

I read that as perception of pigmentation and was like yup.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Lol- no.

(The response)

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
220 points (97.0% liked)

News

21742 readers
3508 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS