this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
106 points (95.7% liked)

politics

18720 readers
3320 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said Tuesday he is directing House committees to open an impeachment inquiry into President Biden, amid pressure from some hard-right members of the Republican caucus to do so.

The inquiry would center on whether Biden benefited from his son Hunter Biden’s business dealings, among other issues, McCarthy said.

“These are allegations of abuse of power, obstruction and corruption and warrant further investigation by the House of Representatives,” McCarthy told reporters Tuesday morning. “That’s why today I am directing our House committee to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.”

McCarthy spoke for three minutes, did not take any questions and left the lectern shortly after making his remarks. McCarthy has previously said he would not launch an inquiry without a vote by the full house.

The House faces a critical Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government and avoid a shutdown. McCarthy has been trying to hang on to support for a funding bill from far-right GOP lawmakers, who have been pushing to impeach Biden.

Republican leaders have been weighing whether to use an impeachment inquiry vote as a bargaining chip in the funding negotiations. But it’s not certain that Republicans have the necessary 218 votes to pass it. Some lawmakers are staunchly against it, and McCarthy has said that an impeachment inquiry would occur through a vote on the House floor, as opposed to his unilateral decision-making.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 49 points 11 months ago (2 children)

We have 99 problems, but an impeachment ain't one.

Housing costs, food costs, education, funding the government, confronting climate change, the war in Europe, and the threat of right-wing terrorism.

These motherfuckers are wasting money and more importantly time to give Trump and his cult a hand job.

#VOTE OUT REPUBLICANS

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is all true. But Kevin can lose his position because of these crazy Republicans.

Republicans want to have Biden be a criminal so so bad that this all they think about. But there is no evidence of this and that is a problem for them.

Stop voting for Republicans, they don't believe in our democracy.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

But there is no evidence of this and that is a problem for them.

Well, not really for that last part. They'll be able to use this as a headline for their mouthbreathing base - "Biden getting investigated" - and of course we can count on the far right media to tell that to the base, as well as the "liberal media" doing the both sides thing again.

There are still so many idiots that are mad at Hillary + Benghaaaaaaazzzzzi over....something. And all because of the exact same ploy.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

Rather than wasting time with the impeachment, I'd love to see waste time and kick out McCarthy from the speaker position. Then they can spend another 15 voting periods not electing anyone else to the position, until finally settling on McCarthy again.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This has the same aims as their bullshit Benghazzzzziiiiiiii "investigations" - it is meant to drive down Biden's numbers in advance of an election.

We can count on the bothsiderist "liberal media" to horse race this again, too.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Yup, CNN and NYT etc are salivating.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good luck, Captain Dipshit. You've spent years, and millions of tax dollars failing to find dirt on him, and you're going ahead with it anyway. And you wonder why the majority of this country find you to be less than intelligent.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's par for the course after investigating the Clintons for nearly 30yrs and only coming up with Billy cheating on his wife. Bidens the new Clinton's as far as Republicans are concerned.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

We all knew he was a cheater.

We didn't know he sexually penetrated a (willing and self-motivated tbf) White House employee with a cigar in the Oval Office and had her fellate him while he was on the phone with a Member of Congress.

It was incredibly tawdry and done while working, at his workplace. So as the people reviewing his job performance, Congress had a right to look into it. At the time I certainly expected him to resign.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There is no such thing as a reasonable republican anymore. And frankly, it's debatable if any of them ever even made it through the Reagan era.

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 12 points 11 months ago

Republicans are utterly useless. What's he being investigated for? "huuurrr we dunno... stuff!" Great job, Kevin.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I like to imagine a future where Biden's impeachment leads to President John Fetterman and VP AOC.

[–] Mammal@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think we all understand this for the empty nothing-burger it is. That said: Hunter Biden testifying before congress would be hilarious! At least a month of Republicans complaining about how Hunter is rich, attractive, has a huge shlong, does drugs, gets any job he wants, and has women lined up to bang him on-demand.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Comer: "Mr. Biden, be honest, would you say your penis is of average length and girth?"

Hunter unzips his fly and allows his schlong to fall on the table with an audible and heavy thump, drawing gasps and a softly said "Holy shit." from Nancy Mace, who stares at it as she attempts to compose herself and hide her blushing face

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Please note, Hunter Biden's penis has been entered into the record."

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

What hasn’t Hunter Biden‘s penis been entered into?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago

(rimshot!)

/wait, phrasing!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I bet anything MGT has an interest in him...

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

From under the shadows of the rafters comes a softly spoken "My precious. Is it huge? Is it tender? We wants it!" as large yellow watery eyes scan the proceedings locking on the massive member laying on the table

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

precious

I could totally see Empty G as a size queen.

Evidently, these gomers seem to think sharing dick pics of Hunter is somehow evidence of....something? All it tells me is that they've been obsessing over his dong. And Marj felt it necessary to put it up on a projector.

Everything they do/say - PROJECTION. In this case, literally.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/ZS7AF2mgEYQ?si=7gBxoYeIOs131pTq

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Facking spineless weasel.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 6 points 11 months ago

What an incredible dumbass.

[–] skabbywag02@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Such a waste of time and money....

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“These are allegations of abuse of power, obstruction and corruption and warrant further investigation by the House of Representatives,” McCarthy told reporters Tuesday morning.

“That’s why today I am directing our House committee to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.”

McCarthy spoke for three minutes, did not take any questions and left the lectern shortly after making his remarks.

The House faces a critical Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government and avoid a shutdown.

McCarthy has been trying to hang on to support for a funding bill from far-right GOP lawmakers, who have been pushing to impeach Biden.

Republican leaders had been weighing whether to use an impeachment inquiry vote as a bargaining chip in the funding negotiations.


The original article contains 223 words, the summary contains 122 words. Saved 45%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

His whole affect was different talking about this thing.

It is such complete bullshit that he can't even manage a tone of voice that sounds like he believes it.