this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
184 points (99.5% liked)

politics

18977 readers
3227 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"I would know, I accepted the bribes"
- the government

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It must be like getting a random boner. You don't want it right now, but it's going to happen.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, I'd say its much more like corruption of democracy. Nobody wants it, and its only good for the rich and affluent.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I meant one part of the body is doing something while the other rejects it. Left hand. Right hand. Etc etc.

The joke sounded better in my head.

[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can we put those involved in prison?

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Former AT&T Illinois President Paul La Schiazza is set to go on trial in September 2024 after being indicted on charges of conspiracy to unlawfully influence then-Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. AT&T itself agreed to pay a $23 million fine in October 2022 in connection with the alleged illegal influence campaign and said it was "committed to ensuring that this never happens again."

Also, the congressman who took the bribes resigned and is facing trial on October 8th, 2024.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago

The legislation will also be overturned right?

... Right?

[–] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s sad to see our Government can be purchased so cheaply…

On the other hand I’m an Illinois resident, how can I sue them over this?

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

You can’t even buy a car for $22500 anymore! The cost to buy political votes is comically low. AT&T is a multibillion dollar company. They probably spend my on toilet paper in a month.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That's how it works in the US, isn't it? Or is it bad because AT&T forgot to say the magic word "lobbying"?

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, it takes a special kind of stupid to go to court over bribery in a country where bribery is legal.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They were caught passing a bag with a dollar sign on it while saying "This money is specifically to pass these laws".

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's gonna take ~~a lot~~ some more bribes to get them out of this pickle!

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Just fines.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The US government has provided more detail on how a former AT&T executive allegedly bribed a powerful state lawmaker's ally in order to obtain legislation favorable to AT&T's business.

Former AT&T Illinois President Paul La Schiazza is set to go on trial in September 2024 after being indicted on charges of conspiracy to unlawfully influence then-Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan.

A contract lobbyist hired by AT&T "is expected to testify that AT&T successfully passed two major pieces of legislation after the company started making payments to Individual FR-1."

In one internal email sent to an AT&T employee, La Schiazza allegedly described the company's quid pro quo with Madigan as "the friends and family plan."

"Madigan's outsized power in the General Assembly meant his approval was necessary for the passage or defeat of legislation of concern to AT&T," the government filing in the La Schiazza case said.

"Specifically, at McClain's request, defendant and his coconspirators arranged for AT&T to pay Individual FR-1, a former state representative and political ally of Madigan, approximately $22,500 for supposed consulting services.


The original article contains 582 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!