126
submitted 1 month ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Joe Biden should have pardoned Donald Trump on all federal criminal charges the moment they were announced, the Utah senator and former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney said.

“Had I been President Biden,” Romney said, “when the justice department brought out indictments, I would have immediately pardoned him. I’d have pardoned President Trump.”

“Why? Well, because it makes me, President Biden, the big guy and the person I pardoned the little guy. And, number two, it’s not going to get resolved before the election. It’s not going to have an impact before the election. And, frankly, the country doesn’t want to have to go through prosecuting a former president.”

Romney was speaking to MSNBC, in an interview to be broadcast on The 11th Hour with Stephanie Ruhle on Wednesday night.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] toast@retrolemmy.com 230 points 1 month ago

And, frankly, the country doesn’t want to have to go through prosecuting a former president.

Yes, we do. We really, really do.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Frankly, the country shouldn’t listen to people who wear magic underwear, yet here you are.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

You're not part of "the country" he's talking about. He means the elites

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh! Like "the Economy."

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The American people never wanted Trump in the first place.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

If we are going to keep the death penalty around federally, an enemy of the state such as Trump is the perfect use. Maybe if we could ever get shit done, we'd ban the death penalty after it from all the people who wouldn't want such to happen, are usually those voting to keep the death penalty.

[-] QuantumSpecter@lemmy.world 80 points 1 month ago

No, the corruption must end and Trump must be made an example off.

Ever since Tricky Dicky and watergate, the politicians haven't felt they can do get away with anything. It must stop!

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 74 points 1 month ago

I guess that’s why Mittens has never been president.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Though Gerald Ford as his model for presidential behavior certainly tracks.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Gerald Ford was Vice President and President but wasn’t voted in for either job.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Mittens was the "God Emperor" of Goonswarm. He was also a totally different person, though he is a lawyer.

[-] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Heh, as years go by, less and less folks recognize my bee stickers at the office. Fucking spais anyways... ;p

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I have armored medical bee stickers. FAX pilot. All four.

[-] Godric@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

We use our words, not pubbie shit

/s

o7

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 53 points 1 month ago

Same people who will let a 14 year old kid be tried as an adult think that a grown man should be let off scot free.

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

So here's a radical idea Mitt, perhaps the previous president shouldn't have committed numerous crimes? Then there wouldn't be any need to prosecute him...

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

So one of his reasons for not prosecuting criminal behavior by the sitting President is, “the country doesn’t feel like it!?”

  1. Says who?
  2. When you say shit like that, it’s really hard to believe the myth that nobody is above the law.
  3. You no longer get to say you’re the “law and order” anything.
[-] Zomg@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Maybe it's true that some people dont want to prosecute a former president, but we have to for the sake of our future.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Only because it's not in their favour. Had it been Obama? They'd do it in an instant!

[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 31 points 1 month ago

Mitt Romney should shut the fuck up.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

So if a pardon is appropriate, doesn't that mean presidents don't enjoy immunity?

[-] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Excellent point. And pardons are only given after the legal system concluded someone is guilty. Mitt is advocating for executive interference over judicial processes.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

They can give out pardons prior to a guilty verdict. But, yeah, that's what a pardon is, executive override.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

They can technically pardon something before a conviction, but accepting the pardon requires admitting guilt to the crime. Basically, the pardon says “this person did it but I’m using executive override to remove any responsibility.” And accepting it is basically going “yeah I agree with both parts; I did it, and I’ll accept the executive override.” You can’t accept the latter “pardon” half without also accepting the former “they did it” half.

[-] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yes. I guess Mitt's medication has changed or he recently took up on pot

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Eat shit, Mitt

[-] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Yes, we do want the rich and politicians to be held accountable.

I wonder why a rich politician would say such a thing.

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Romney believes that if he folds like Chamberlain, that Republicans can control Trump. Chamberlain was wrong, and so is Romney.

[-] tastysnacks@programming.dev 18 points 1 month ago

Politicians are not good people. And they don’t want the law affecting them.

[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

Eh, there's some good eggs out there. Katie Porter, AOC, Bernie Sanders, etc...

The system resists them, but they're out there. I've often considered trying to do it myself, because someone has to.

[-] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

If you're serious about this, there are resources available.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I don't give 47% of a shit what Mittens the Car Topper Dog has to say.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

The fuck? Mitt… you hate Trump?!

[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

He loves the party though, and they chose Trump, so now he has to say garbage like this.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

No he doesn't, it's all an act. If he was invited to dinner right now, he'd jump at the chance

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

If Biden doesn't win, we will probably get a bystander idea of what the Book of Revelations looks like. I mean, if you can blatantly commit crimes, including insurrection, when Trump is sidelined, imagine what is possible when he's back in charge?

I'm not even American but this will even impact upon me. Indirectly, what you guys do over there follows us home in lots of ways.

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This wouldn't fly with them if tables were turned. What is he even going on about? This is so disconnected. #LifeBeforeRegunz

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

More proof Mitt does not belong anywhere near the government, as if we didn't have enough proof already. Extremely shameful for the country that he has the position he does.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Go fuck yourself, Mittens.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A spineless twat would say such a thing.

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Fuck off Mitt.

[-] eighthourlunch@kbin.social 6 points 1 month ago

Mitt the Shit should STFU.

[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

I mean I do agree with the points that it would be torture for Trump to have to choose between being the focus of a witch hunt or the pitiful disgraced president who only was saved by the kindness of his opponent. When I heard Biden is "throwing down the gauntlet" to debate Trump again, I let out the biggest groan. If I were him I wouldn't give Trump a platform to look like an equal. I know it feels good to want to beat the living shit out of Trump, but I understand from a political perspective that it might not be the best strategy to win in 2024. I liked it better when Biden was acting senile and not childish.

After that it's hard not to see the negative consequences of pardoning Trump. There should be a message to other politicians that we are not afraid to send you to jail.

[-] 5in1k@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Prosecute the shit out of that traitor. Fuck you Mitt you vulture.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

I really thought his answer would be “ because then he wouldn’t be running” or “ so he couldn’t plea the fifth

this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
126 points (84.2% liked)

News

21721 readers
3265 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS