this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
307 points (95.5% liked)

News

23406 readers
3279 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What a silly hill to die on. This is blatantly unconstitutional. That's obvious to everyone, even those of us who might agree in spirit. So it's just a waste. A waste of time and tax payer money. New Mexico is gonna spend time and resources on this that could be better spent elsewhere.

What's more it wastes political capital. Capital that is gonna be needed soon for the Democratic party. So I can't fathom why she's doing this. She just gave conservatives the high ground and a huge rallying call.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

With the current court, it is unconstitutional. Several states banned public carry when the country was founded including Virginia so it's not like that was unheard of at the time.

[–] Kaliax@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

100% this. It feels like sabotage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] deconstruct@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A judge has already issued a temporary order to block the ban.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thank goodness, the murders can continue

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (25 children)

I know right, this governor should have made murder illegal instead touches forhead

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] electrogamerman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

For a second there I worried my children could die without firearms!

[–] Poob@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Open or concealed carry is insane. You Americans are unhinged.

This is from a gun owner.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Believing a politician can unilaterally suspend a right protected by both the federal and state constitution is unhinged.

[–] Poob@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wasn't commenting on that, I was commenting on carrying a gun in public

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Licensed concealed carriers have a lower violent crime rate than the general public. So its unhinged to ban these individuals from carrying thinking it'll stop criminals.

[–] Poob@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Again, I wasn't commenting about the ban. Just the desire to carry a gun in public.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Licensed concealed carriers have a lower violent crime rate than the general public.

Than the general public in America maybe, but legal gun owners in other countries have a violent crime rate of functionally zero, since they're properly vetted through laws that aren't dogshit.

But even giving you that point, what about all the violent crime those permissive laws enable?

Over 70% of mass shooters use legal firearms. Of the remaining, most are teenagers who took the poorly secured firearm of a family member.

There is no magic gun fairy distributing illegal firearms. Every firearm in the hands of a criminal was either bought legally, stolen from a "responsible gun owner" who didn't secure it, straw purchased or purchased through a loophole.

Nevertheless, the pro-gun community opposes more robust background checks, mandatory safe storage laws or the closing of loopholes.

And what does the public get in return? Mostly just shot because none of the pro-gun promises have come true.

Good guys with guns intervene in 3% of shootings. The crime rate remains the same as comparable countries. The country is no more free when measured by any metric except guns. The government spies on and kills its own citizens.

The gun laws are a failure.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I don't feel like writing an essay to address all your points, I don't have the time right now I'm sorry. Ultimately it comes down to the fact the highest law (and most state constitutions) of the land gives us the inalienable right to arms. Period. (And no "well regulated" does not mean legal regulations)

I believe we would be far better off dealing with the root of violence, like many European countries have done but gun control advocates like to only focus on gun control laws. People with financial, health, reproductive, and employment security don't commit violent crimes. Things like labor protections, maternity/paternity leave, mandatory vacation time, physical and mental healthcare that won't bankrupt you are some of the things that dramatically reduce all violent crime regardless of the tool used.

Look at violent crimes in the US compared to the UK for things like murder using only the human body (ie kicks, punches, strangulation, etc), its lower per 100k in the UK and many other European countries. There's no body control laws restricting how strong or trained your body can be, yet its lower. Its because people who's needs are actually met don't need to turn to or are driven to crime, our social protections in the USA suck ass and need to be fixed.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] missveeronica@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I saw, even the Democrat AG of New Mexico won't support or defend this in court.

[–] sith_lord_zitro@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, she's also lost the support of many of her party members.

[–] theostermanweekend@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Goddam...we love our guns, though.

load more comments
view more: next ›