171

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16064759

Sorry Darin, not a grass

On some things the UK is progressive, on other issues, like sustainable transport, they see it as antisocial behaviour.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rosamundi@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago

Cross-posting my comment from the other community:

I think what our mate Darin is referring to by “e-bikes” is throttle-operated, no need to pedal, capable of going 30-60mph electric motorbike which, like any other motorbike, you need a licence and protective gear to ride, and no, they’ve got no business being in the bike lane with people noodling along at 10-15mph, and definitely not on the pavement with pedestrians.

Unfortunately, Darin is an idiot who can’t string a sentence together and so he’s just told everyone that my electric assist pedal cycle, top assisted speed of 15.5mph, no need for a licence or insurance, is also illegal. Thanks, Darin.

This House of Commons briefing from 2019 lays out what the issues are with e-scooters, in that because they’re not legally classed as a bicycle, they have the same legal requirements as a motorbike, which is clearly nonsense for a scooter with a top speed of 15.5mph, however, the law has not yet caught up with reality. Since that briefing was written, various trials have started in cities with hired e-scooters provided by third parties to see how the law needs to be updated and what needs to change in order to make them legal on UK roads, but the trials seem to just keep getting extended with no conclusions drawn. As we’re currently in election purdah, nothing’s going to happen until July anyway, and I highly doubt that “sorting out e-scooter legality” will be top of the new government’s priority list.

[-] barkdoor@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Escooter trials failed in York and Canterbury which shows that there are some spaces where they don't fit.

There are a limited number of medieval tourist hotspots but it is probably a bad idea to have anything too speedy in pedestrianised areas at peak times.

[-] KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

The trial is currently going on in Oxford and I think is going pretty well. The primary issue I've found is that the infrastructure just isn't good enough to keep up with this use, and so pedestrians, cyclists, and e-scooter riders are all uncomfortably close together considering their vastly different speeds.

If we improve the infrastructure though, I think they're great.

[-] rosamundi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks. I've only been to York once that I can remember but I can see immediately why it failed. Something whizzing along silently in a crowded pedestrian area with narrow pavements so people will be stepping into the road without looking, is fairly obviously going to be a disaster.

[-] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

This is partially solved by auto limiting them when they enter a pedestrianised area. Seemed to work well in my local trial.

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 48 points 3 weeks ago

Is this a joke? Don't UK police have better things to do?

[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 34 points 3 weeks ago

Yes they do. That's why they're asking the general public to snitch on themselves.

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 8 points 3 weeks ago

The police has been underfunded and understaffed for decades as a result of Thatcherite economics treating public services as businesses and austerity policies, meaning the bar has got quite low for policing standards, making it a breeding ground for abusers with small amounts of power, all the while being too corrupt for any of them to do anything about it.

[-] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 39 points 3 weeks ago

Everyone be sure to keep an eye out for police cyclists, if it looks like their cycle has an electric bit on it be sure and report them to darin

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

Seeing things like this where the public is asked for help in identifying their own friends and family, or community members, reminds me of something very similar.

[-] faceula@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

Just send them back the standard response I get back from the police based on any interaction I've experienced with them... Case closed due to insufficient evidence. Would you like to speak to a victim support officer?

[-] calamitycastle@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck me the UK is so broken.

Why don't they put some effort towards legislating a transport strategy that works. At least London managed to see off the ULEZ protest vote... I would guess officer Darin probably thinks ULEZ is bullshit, what a narc

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

Because 14 years of Conservative government and a culture war against anything that doesn't contribute to traffic jams.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Conservatives campaigning about change and how they're going to fix the broken British state is completely ironic.

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Please vote tactically. The Tories have to feel the consequences of this.

[-] themaninblack@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

OI! Where's your nonexistent e-bike loicense?

[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Report the cops and their families

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

My analog bike isn't taxed either, so what are they going to do to me?

[-] christophski@feddit.uk 9 points 3 weeks ago

It doesn't require tax because it is not motorised, that is the cause of this issue

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I'll bite. So cars use the road and because the road needs maintenance we pay a tax on the vehicle, registration, license etc bs. But a bike or just walking on the road would hardly do anything to the road. So taxation of the road use, where does it end? Let's say everyone gave up their cars and stopped paying taxes for the road, would that mean we all have to pay exactly what we used to pay for car worthy roads? Or maybe the roads get smaller for bicycle use? But how do you get big items around? Like a big rig bringing crates full of food to a store? Shouldn't taxes shift over to the food instead of the people traveling and minimally affecting the road? Surely, if the road degraded it would be because of truck traffic.

[-] christophski@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying the situation. It is very stupid. We should be encouraging these kinds of eco-friendly personal transport methods and they should absolutely have total priority over cars

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

I'll bite. So cars use the road and because the road needs maintenance we pay a tax on the vehicle, registration, license etc bs. But a bike or just walking on the road would hardly do anything to the road. So taxation of the road use, where does it end? Let's say everyone gave up their cars and stopped paying taxes for the road, would that mean we all have to pay exactly what we used to pay for car worthy roads? Or maybe the roads get smaller for bicycle use? But how do you get big items around? Like a big rig bringing crates full of food to a store? Shouldn't taxes shift over to the food instead of the people traveling and minimally affecting the road? Surely, if the road degraded it would be because of truck traffic.

[-] rosamundi@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Not all e-bikes are illegal to use on the public road, so Darin is also wrong.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 3 weeks ago

You can totally insure an e-bike. They're usually on the same product category that regular bikes, with a slightly higher cost if they have electrical and fire coverage.

[-] rosamundi@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

If it's an illegal electric motorbike (which is what is being referred to here, electric assist pedal bikes aren't illegal), you can't insure it.

[-] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

What a bunch of fucks

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

what an absolute cunt.

I dislike the things being left everywhere, but this is absolutely twatworthy

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 weeks ago

What is the UK progressive on exactly? The shithole is backwards as fuck compared to the rest of Western Europe and even US blue states.

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

We're basically coasting on the achievements of prior administrations. Unfortunately we've had 14 years of Conservative government, and the prior Labour one was the most neoliberal Labour administration there has ever been

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, coasting is not how I'd put it, sinking like a stone is more like it. NHS is collapsing, housing is utterly unaffordable, costs of living are skyrocketing, protests are banned, gender affirming care for young people is banned, it's a pretty horrid place to be right now.

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, can't disagree with any of that

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

and even US

Haha yeah, but actually, no. They still have literally stalinist communist hellhole things like public health care, unemployment insurance and public transport, which, due to freedom™️, the US does not have to suffer from.

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

public health care

If you wait 20 years for it

unemployment insurance

That doesn't actually allow one to afford anything

public transport

Apart from London it's largely non-functional and privatised to hell and back

UK is a shithole, don't let the rose-tinted glasses for mild social policies in other countries in Europe fool you.

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
171 points (93.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

8607 readers
209 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS