wtf…can you charge someone with union busting when they run an entirely different company? this is particularly brazen of him…
feels like a warning shot against tesla workers for sure.
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10179 readers
431 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"Free speech for me, partisanship, political meddling, and autocracy for thee."
imagine thinking this actually hurts the UAW. Musk can't even get news sites to take the Twitter name change seriously; why would anyone care that they lost their worthless verification?
Can they just pay their damn workers and not make it come to this? The used car market is only starting to recover from the covid shortage induced craziness.
He's a petty little shitte
I’m not bothering to dig it back up, but I thought I remember something like it was based on a policy when a verified user changes their logo. The verification was put back once reverified. Stupid, yes, but if policy it makes more sense.
I’m not big on defending Xitter, but IF this is uniformly handled, this is the least of our reasons to get torches and pitchforks after them.