this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
112 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

34130 readers
465 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] recycledbits@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Let's look at what are they apologizing for: "for the confusion and angst ... [the policy we announced] caused". Not for the policy itself. Right, "we're sorry you got mad".

And what are they going to do about it? "making changes"

As far as corporate non-apologies go, this is definitely one of them.

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Business speak apology PR might work on the average gamer.

This is businesses he tried to screwed over.

But it just goes to show that some CEOs have no idea what their product does.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago

His product sells ads. There's a game engine in there somewhere to get people through the door, but that's not what he considers the product.

[–] pipe01@lemmy.pipe01.net 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It does say "the policy we announced", not "the announcement"

[–] recycledbits@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago

You're right, fixed. I think my point is still valid though.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, there was no "confusion." They meant what they said the first time.

Believe people when they tell you what they are.

[–] NineSwords@lemmy.ml 63 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

The trust is gone and Unity will never be able to gain it back. The damage is done.

I also wonder if this is just playing out as planned by Unity. Try to push out a change that will piss people off by adding a more egregious change and then say "we hear you" and roll back to the change they wanted to push initially.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Iirc this was the kinda thing Tortellini was doing while he was at EA. Shove out a bad thing, apologize, shove out slightly less bad thing.

Edit: Sure enough, they're trying to push out a less shitty version now. They planned it this way the whole time.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They only way they could even have a shot at getting the trust back would be to do a 180, revert all the shit decision like remove license tracking and whatnot, and in their ToS commit to clear guarantees like the original ToS being applicable not just to the version of Unity you have, but to the whole major version so you apply for LTS updates under the original license you started developing for.

If they want to charge more or extra for free to play games or something, they can still do that, just not in a shit way.

Oh and they should take another look at their data collection to better comply with privacy laws and whatnot.

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Their ToS did say that updates would only apply to the current major version and newer of Unity when the updated ToS was released, but they removed that clause without telling anyone about a year ago and are claiming their changes are retroactive, so that can't even be trusted. At this point, I can't see any game dev beginning work on a new Unity project ever again without some kind of ironclad guarantee that this would never happen again. My prediction is we'll see maybe 1 or 2 years of games released on Unity, just from the ones that were already too far into development to start over on something else, and then Unity is done for good.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago

Ah was it for the major version already? Well they shozuld definitely go back to that, if not even further then to show their commitment (like, say, 2 LTS versions).

But yeah, you are right. We've already seen hundreds of people check out Godot, I hope it only grows from there.

[–] Koen967@feddit.nl 8 points 11 months ago

I doubt any of this is going according to plan. After this debacle devs will leave Unity because you know they are gonna think up some new fee to screw devs over. This at least makes it so that games in development with Unity have a chance to release and pick another engine after that project.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 11 months ago

Too late. Never trust them again.

They showed their true intentions

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 46 points 11 months ago

We're sorry you called us out on our bullshit.

We will try to fuck you over more subtly next time.

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 21 points 11 months ago

They lost all trust with the proposed changes. No amount of apologies or non-apologies are going to matter at this point. It's entirely damage control on the Titanic now. I don't believe there's anything that can rescue the sinking ship that is Unity.

[–] DrQuint@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago

Lol.

Lmao even.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 19 points 11 months ago
[–] mythic_tartan@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago
[–] anewbeginning@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

They’re trying to put the lid back on Pandora’s box. Good luck with that.

[–] unreachable@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"we're sorry that you all didn't agree with our terms demand, so we cancel the term, for now"

[–] recycledbits@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago

Not even that. More like "stop shouting and give us a few days, we'll change some things, we promise".

[–] Zellith@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

We have altered the deal. Pray we do not alter it further.

This deals getting worse all the time!

[–] talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago
[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 months ago

Cool. Still don't care.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You want to prove you're sorry? Fire your CEO. He is going to lose you a LOT of money.

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The CEO is not the issue here.

The man sold 50k stocks in the company just this year, 2k of which the day before the announcement, he knows this is suicide.

The board needs to go, but the reality is that unless you go private there's not much to do on that front.

In fact, when they do fire him, don't expect things to change. This is an Ellen Pao maneuver.