Hopefully, this starts a trend to step down when you are no longer able-bodied to be a congress person.
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10181 readers
100 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm sure you didn't mean for your comment to come across negatively, but "able-bodied" carries some history of stigmatizing folks with physical limitations. If you meant "able to perform their duties as a congress person" then I very much agree; that's a trend I'd support in spite of a very real concern that it's only the kinds of people who should stick around that will willingly give up their access and power.
"able-bodied" has always meant able to perform duties
Yes that is exactly what I meant. Historically able-bodied has meant someone who can do the tasks asked of them for the job. This is where "able-bodied sailor" comes from. Not because they are ableist but because they want sailors who can walk on slippery ship decks and lift 50 pounds. With modern technology that's become more accessible but this is still the title a lot of governments and companies use because able-bodied means able to do the tasks expected of the job, not non-disabled.
So if you prefer I say something else, what would you like me to replace able-bodied with?
I don't think I have a good answer for you, even having thought about it for some time this morning. It's a common term in plenty of circles (my father was a coastie) but it's also something I've seen used as vernacular shorthand to exclude. A motivator for my original reply was my desire to clarify the term's use in this context, but I think I was clumsy with it.
No worries, we are all human and if anyone finds my word choices troubling then I'd want to clarify and potentially change them as well.
Only for Democrats, unfortunately.
It's an unpopular opinion and even I don't know how I feel about it, but I almost feel like democrats should run until they get voted out same as Republicans. Because of her being a good person, this seat is now back in contention and the democrats don't have the incumbent advantage they should. Until everyone is forced to play by the rules, one side playing by the rules and the other not just means that the side that flaunts the rules will win.
That is a concern but the oldest senator is a Democrat, Feinstein. Also, typically, these seats are not really in contention because voters are strictly party-based at this point. So I don't think Democrats stepping down with medical issues will cause seats to flip most of the time. Those in less stable voting blocks could simply hold their seats.
Essentially, there is a way to look like you are playing by the rules when you aren't.
Even though McConnell isn't older, I'd argue he's a bigger issue because of the power he wields.
That is a valid point about the "Looking like you're playing by the rules but not really". It sucks that this isn't the case though, since this is the first democrat representative for this district in 40 years.
My dad died from this. It's a horrible way to go. I'm sorry to hear anyone else has to deal with this condition.