Or, the end of the mini-ice-age resulted in flooding that equated to a rise of something like 20 stories (as in building levels) of water in lower regions including the Fertile Crescent. It would make sense that the first (known) civilizations would have great flood myths because their lands were wiped out during their lifetimes. Did the entire world flood? From their perspective yes. From that of geologists, no.

Edit: Oh, and I want to cancel all religions. Christianity isn’t special.

I thought the earth was only about 6000 years old?

Imagine that! A place in one part of the world having depictions of animals that aren't native to that specific place! We've never seen that before in history! It's not like the Roman empire wiped out certain animal species in Africa from hunting and had depictions of them despite them not being native to Rome! Yeah, that never happened!

Thanks for being the heart and soul of this community @FlyingSquid@lemmy.world

I read your posts every day and your content is primo.

Gobekli Tepe is really interesting. Not for the reasons this guy thinks, but just in general. I find that whole "new" area of archaeology pretty fascinating. I'm not even that old and I remember being taught that large scale societies didn't exist until Sumeria and the more areas like Gobekli Tepe are studied the more it seems like societies go back way further

these points may blow your mind

Point 6 is literally just "idk, maybe it was the flood." Amazing point.

Oh look, it’s almost as if indoctrinating children with stupidity frameworks should be illegal, but instead we’re doing it in schools.

Any reputable scientific proposal must include the phrase "may blow your mind." Otherwise you just can't trust that source.