this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
205 points (100.0% liked)

News

23296 readers
3297 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16783334

8-1 with Thomas the dissent.

“The court and government do not point to a single historical law revoking a citizen’s Second Amendment right based on possible interpersonal violence,” Thomas wrote. “Yet, in the interest of ensuring the Government can regulate one subset of society, today’s decision puts at risk the Second Amendment rights of many more.”

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lol of course Thomas would be the only one to dissent. Though, I am surprised that Alito didn’t also.

To be honest, I am kinda surprised this was upheld at all, given how conservative the supreme court is.

Not that I’m complaining; at the very least it’s a step in the direction for gun control.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He was absent today as I read.

[–] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I see that now at the end of the article; it’s his second absence.

Still, the ruling says 8-1. Did he rule for it in his absence? Or should the ruling actually be 7-1-1 (or something?)

[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It takes a long time to deliver these decisions. The majority opinion is written weeks beforehand, with hundreds of man hours put into it by the justices and their clerks. Alito would have already read and approved it (or he would have joined Thomas in dissent). They heard the arguments for the case on another day, this is just the deliverance of the ruling.

[–] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

This makes sense.

I am still surprised Alito voted with the majority lol.

[–] Ioughttamow@kbin.run 6 points 4 months ago

With the court's conservative lean, silence is consent

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Maybe he’s dying.

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That 40% of cops will be able to keep theirs since they claim the time they spend beating their spouses as "overtime".

[–] 555_1@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Their spouses must have been holding a cell phone that looked like a gun.

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm curious to see how this works with law enforcement.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 4 months ago

Law enforcement officials immune to domestic violence accusations

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good luck getting a restraining order against your abusive partner when he's a cop.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 3 points 4 months ago

I had a girlfriend that was a sheriff deputy. those people seriously have each other's backs with things. it's definitely a government-sanctioned gang.

[–] BassaForte@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

That's how it's been IIRC. This is just the SC saying it's going to stay that way.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not having legal precedence is hardly a reason to dissent, Thomas.

I'm pretty sure the 13th amendment had about the same level of legal precedence too.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Not having legal precedence is hardly a reason to dissent...

Under the Bruen test it is. Even the majority would agree with that. Thomas differed from them by stating that the laws proposed in the main opinion were not relevantly similar enough to the one before the correct.

The test wouldn't apply to the 13th amendment because that's a constitutional amendment, and not a law allegedly impacting a right.

[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

Sweet!

Cops without guns is a giant leap forward for America!