381

I know I can spoof my useragent, it's just ridiculous that such a massive app doesn't support an equally massive browser.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 80 points 6 days ago

That's okay, I use Firefox and don't support Snapchat.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 days ago

Fuck every form of this. Website: you deliver the document, and I decide if it works.

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago

You are supposed to do feature detection, not user agent detection since it is easily spoofed, isn’t realiable, & doesn’t account for literally all the alternative UAs that can support it. This is bad/lazy practice.

Fx doesn’t always have all the features you need, but often it usually does & where I have seen this as being deployed is management saying it isn’t worth the effort to support. Just having one person on the team running Fx is usually enough to catch the game-breaking bugs.

load more comments (2 replies)

what's even the advantage in this?

[-] holgersson@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Something marketing and having your service not appear dysfunctional or buggy to the stupid, stupid enduser

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 32 points 6 days ago

As @denschub@schub.social always emphasises: make sure to file a report at https://webcompat.com!

We ask everyone to file their reports, because all reports are really useful. Even if we don't respond to every single thing you report, it's a signal that we're processing in many different ways. (...) please, keep reporting all issues you see, because every single blip counts!

https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1de7bu1/comment/l8ghtr2/

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 8 points 6 days ago

never knew about this but I'm definitely going to start using it

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

… Snapchat for web??? Wtf

[-] Buildout@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Have I ever told you the story of Darth Microsoft Teams? Only Chrome and Edge. Some limited stuff works in Firefox, but it's flaky at best.

[-] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

As a firefox user... This.
Calls work now, but dont you dare share a screen in the call.

... But meetings work fine, even if you share a screen. Thanks microsoft.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 8 points 5 days ago
[-] Nobilmantis@feddit.it 7 points 5 days ago

On desktop (which is what the website in question is mostly loaded in) is 6,6%. Still isnt huge but definitely more significant.

[-] neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago

Wow Firefox just barely beats out Samsung internet and opera???

I knew chrome had the majority but I didn't know even edge was above Firefox in market share.

There's like 30 people at the company I work for. 8 of them use Firefox only, about 10 of them use Firefox half of the time when chrome breaks or hogs every resource possible.

[-] Cube6392@beehaw.org 1 points 5 days ago

REMINDER: These market share figures are self reported based on browser user agents. For over a decade now, Firefox requires you to opt into this reporting. Its true that Firefox has been slipping in market share, and that things can be rather gloomy, but they're not as doomed as its widely reported. The big driver of declining market share for Firefox these days is CTOs telling their engineering directors to not check Firefox compatibility because they perceive it as wasted time for 6.6% of people. The easiest way to combat Google Chrome's hegemony is to show friends and family that actually most of the internet works on Firefox despite what you've been told, and that also Firefox isn't somehow outdated

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 2 points 5 days ago

But it's the fourth most popular browser according to your chart. Considering there's probably 2 billion browser users, that's something in the ballpark of 40 million users. 20 if you say 1 billion.

[-] mr_satan@monyet.cc 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Snapchat has a web client? :o

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

~~you can't snap, can only message~~ edit: im wrong you can snap now.

[-] lseif@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 days ago

doesnt that kind of defeat the point ?

[-] mr_satan@monyet.cc 7 points 6 days ago

Dunno never saw the appeal anyway

[-] festnt@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

what even is the point of snapchat?

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

well it was sending nudes at first, before people realized that nothing really got erased

[-] JameUwU@lemmy.ml 21 points 6 days ago

I would simply not use the service. Capitalism says good services are rewarded for being good, the inverse would be they dont get to make money off of you for a bad service

[-] blakeus12@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago

but capitalism doesnt work

[-] JameUwU@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

It doesn't work for us but its clearly working for someone.

[-] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 days ago

doesn't it utilize some fancy camera APIs or whatever? last time I tried it on firefox with a spoofed user agent there were errors in the console

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 7 points 6 days ago

yeah it just won't let me in on firefox at all, i had to use chr*mium 🤮 in a vm to get in

[-] refalo@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago

holy shit stop using snapchat

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago

I just want to say, this is less bad than websites requiring that you use internet explorer.

Those were dark days.

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 3 points 5 days ago

It's just slightly less bad cause it requires a chromium based browser

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

Oh yeah, I'm not saying it's good, just less bad.

Now instead of being crammed into a single option, you get the "choice" of several (probably equally bad) options.

Honestly, everything should just conform to standards, and it's up to the browser to support those standards. If your browser doesn't support it, well, good luck.

Not this bullshit of "your browser isn't compatible with this website". Fuck you and the horse you rode in on.

[-] DeaDvey@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

Use a user agent switcher, works for me.

[-] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I can reach the login page on FF Mobile with user agent switcher + desktop mode

[-] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Just another feature imo

[-] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago

Firefox doesn't support snapchat? Finally a good feature.

[-] folak@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
381 points (98.0% liked)

Firefox

16767 readers
205 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS