this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
119 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
271 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xepher@lemm.ee 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do it. Kill it once and for all.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

Yeah, hoping is entourage of Yes Men makes him believe this is the best decision ever.

[–] marco@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Crowd's chanting: "Do it! Do it! Do it!"

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Watch me delete X faster than you can say "money" Elon.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I nuked it a long time ago. Late to the party?

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use it to get the latest news on NFL and NBA. Otherwise it's gone.

[–] GeekFTW@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Alto@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

This is the answer. The handful of people I still wanted to follow on Twitter all have sportsbots accounts mirroring them on Mastodon.

[–] ThePJN@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean either he's just the stupidest or this is all intentional and he wanted to kill Twitter in the first place. Either way, fudge him and his weird face.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not if his intention was the latter. Finally he does something good.

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Twitter was fine before he took over. It had its issues, sure, but it’s nowhere near the dumpster fire it is because of Musk.

It’s already out that Musk’s sole purpose was to get “wokeness” out of Twitter. It seems that his intention was to do so by any means necessary, including the death of Twitter.

I was fairly content with Twitter pre-Muskrat. Now I want it to die. And I don’t see this as any particular good that Musk is doing, quite the opposite. He has a selfish, narcissistic agenda and has the money to back it up. The only thing I’m thankful for is that the piece of shit can’t be President of the US. But sadly we have plenty of other US-born, moronic, narcissistic pieces of shit working toward that goal again.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nah twitter was a toxic wastesite. Anytime I went on there, there was something horrible trending on the sidebar and people voicing opinions and yelling at someone. People were being doxxed left and right just for not towing the "woke" line. I didn't participate in twitter because I would have never felt safe there.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

not towing the “woke” line

It sounds like you’d be right at home there now, though.

[–] mobyduck648@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I’ve no love for Musk but Twitter is full of pretty unpleasant people in general and it made political journalism worse by encouraging low-effort hot takes over slower more thoughtful content. I won’t miss it when it’s gone.

My problem isn’t really with its politics (I’m quite left-wing myself these days) but its personalities, you can be politically progressive without having the mentality of a schoolyard bully and that’s what Twitter was fundamentally about, bullying the main character of the day.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Yep. I have no issue with people I disagree with. I enjoy engagement and good faith debate. But people would doxx you just for disagreeing with them, even if you weren't advocating for actual harm to people, etc (in that case it's twitter who should ban them)

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago
[–] ripcord@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, it's critical that he "kill the woke mind virus".

[–] garrett@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

I don’t think he’s smart enough to stick the landing on anything. Based on the new biography, it sounds like he’s just mad at his daughter over “wokeism”.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 20 points 1 year ago

It's a great way to make people migrate from Twitter, now X, to some other platform like Mastodon that works like Twitter, now X, but doesn't have to pay a fee or have an unstable billionaire handling the platform like Twitter, now X.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So tired of hearing about this moronic war criminal every day. Wake me up when he's behind bars.

[–] aka_oscar@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I believe there is a browser extension that lets you block posts about rich people, in case you truly dont give a fuck about their endeavours. I dont remember its name but you could certainly use it

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago

As funny as this is, this is a good opportunity to remind everyone: if you can afford to kick a few bucks to your instance maintainer, do so. This will help to prevent them from feeling the need to generate income from your instance using other means.

[–] azurefirefly@lemmy.basedcount.com 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm convinced he's salty that he had to go through with the deal and is now purposely nose diving twitter to kill it off

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago

This is gold Jerry! Gold!

[–] BigTrout75@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

Ugh, the daily dumb thoughts from rich people.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Literally no way this could go tits up!

[–] ninjakitty7@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Looking at Unity and thought “I could do you one better”.

[–] Safeguard@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

I remember there used to be an idea floating around of paying pennies for sending email a few years ago. It would combat spam, since it would not be economically viable to send millions of emails. It failed; since it would kill email, no-one wanted to pay and lock access rights to a certain group of people.

Elon is claiming he wants this for combating bots and scraping. Whether true or not, he will realize soon enough though that people will not pay for it. (Perhaps even find out it's not bots, but actual people downvoting him)

(At the same time, it's a bad thing we do not want to pay for good journalism/info, it leads to free ad-riddled sites with shitty click-baity content. The good stuff is behind paywalls, and therefore not available to the general public. This leads to a breeding ground for conspiracy theories. Since those are available for free (they want the message out there) and the actual researched stuff is hidden behind those paywals)

[–] pingveno@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, Br’er Musk, I don’t care what you do with me, so long as you just don’t throw me in that briar patch over there.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Deep cut from the vault…

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summarySpeaking in a meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, the Tesla CEO and world’s richest person suggested that X was going to charge its user base.

Currently, Twitter only charges users for its subscription service X Premium, which offers perks such as a verified account checkmark and costs $11 a month in the US for iPhones and £11 in the UK.

Musk, who has a history of making impromptu statements, did not confirm whether X would definitely push ahead with a charging policy.

Musk has raised the prospect of a paywall as the platform battles an entrenched decline in advertising, its main source of income.

Musk has said an advertiser boycott, spurred by concerns over his leadership of the platform and its management of inappropriate or hateful content, has caused ad revenue to decline by 60%.

Netanyahu said he hoped Musk would find ways within the confines of the first amendment to clamp down on antisemitism and other forms of hatred on X.


Saved 59% of original text.

[–] Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

You beautiful bot!