251

Finally i'm gonna be able to contribute!

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

basic or nothing

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 73 points 3 days ago

Good thing that this isn't actually possible...

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 89 points 3 days ago

Don't tempt fate. There are already two kernels written in javascript

[-] spacecadet@lemm.ee 56 points 3 days ago

Why would God allow this to happen?

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 40 points 3 days ago

To punish us for the sin that is inventing JavaScript.

[-] Barbossa404@feddit.de 27 points 3 days ago

Why do you think God stays in heaven, in fear of what He created?

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

For the benefit of any of Today's 10,000 I just want to point out that this is a reference to a quote from a movie.
The same movie stars Danny Trejo as Machete.
This movie is Spy Kids 2.

[-] theRealBassist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

For the benefit of any of Today's 10,000

Haven't seen that referenced in a hot minute lol

Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1053

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago
[-] camr_on@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We killed Him

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 days ago

How? You'd need to compile it down to machine code somehow, for the processor to have any clue how to run it. And you'd need some custom library with custom compile instructions, to be able to control memory allocations, memory addresses etc..

I did a quick search and found two operating systems written in JS, both of which cop out when it comes to the kernel. Did you maybe mix it up with those?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There's almost always at least a little ASM sprinkled into any kernel, so that's not a big deal.

OTOH, there is the factor of "you know how Chrome takes up 2GB per tab? What if that was a whole OS?"

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Maybe I did, I haven't looked any of them carefully

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Theoretically if you found a way to compile PHP, you probably could though, right?

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

I mean, I'm a bit out of my water there, both in terms of the featureset of PHP and what's actually needed for a kernel, but I'm still gonna go with no.

For one, PHP uses reference counting + garbage collection for memory management. That's normally done by the language runtime, which you won't have when running baremetal.

Maybe you could implement a kernel, which does as few allocations as possible (generally a good idea for a kernel, but no idea, if it's possible with PHP), and then basically just let it memory leak until everything crashes.
Then again, the kernel is responsible for making processes crash when they have a memory leak. Presumably, our PHP kernel would just start overwriting data from running processes and eventually overwrite itself in memory(?). Either way, it would be horrendous.

Maybe you could also try to implement some basic reference counting into your own PHP code, so that your own code keeps track of how often you've used an object in your own code. Certainly doesn't sound like fun, though.

Well, and secondly, I imagine, you'd also still need an extension of the language, to be able to address actual memory locations and do various operations with them.

I know from Rust, that they've got specific functions in the stdlib for that, see for example: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ptr/index.html#functions
Presumably, PHP does not have such functions, because its users aren't normally concerned with that.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Right -- I'm not saying you could build a compiler then just go to town. You would still have to build all the tools, using PHP, to interact with hardware, the way other languages do. A horrible idea, lol, but interesting, sort of. Since at its core as long as you can execute logic and read/write to memory, you could do it, I think

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

But that is what I mean with it needing an extension of the language.

So, I'm not saying you could just build a library that calls existing PHP functions to make it all work. Rather I'm saying there's certain machine code instructions, which just cannot be expressed in PHP. And we need those machine code instructions for actually managing memory. So, I am talking about reading/writing to memory not being possible, unless we resort to horrible hacks.

Since we are building our own compiler anyways, we could add our own function-stubs and tell our compiler to translate them to those missing machine code instructions. But then that is a superset of PHP. It wouldn't be possible in PHP itself.

Again, I'm not entirely sure about the above, but my web search skills couldn't uncover any way to actually just read from a memory address in PHP.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I mean, I think we're saying the same thing, you just have better vocabulary than I :)

[-] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I did use a crypto mining OS that was Linux but with lots of scripts that were written in… PHP! I never thought I’d see it.

[-] BurningTurtle@programming.dev 53 points 3 days ago

If we are rewriting it, we should use holyc to make it the way god intended.

[-] raman_klogius@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago

Ring 0 all the way baybee!!

As a PHP developer, I'm in full support and look forward to contributing to what will be a vastly simpler and easier to use Linux kernel.

[-] ulkesh@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago

As a PHP developer

I’m so, so sorry.

[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 days ago

And the Community rejoices at the perspective of your valuable contributions!

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Update: thank you for pointing out to me which community this was posted on.

I'm going to leave this post up as a cautionary tale for people like me who don't pay enough attention!


But Linux is cool cuz it's so fast and it doesn't break.

Long as I've been using it anyway.

So now linux is going to be much slower, going to break and be more susceptible to security breaches?

I'm not a programmer, is the upside supposed to be that with so many more programmers able to work on the kernel, those issues will be able to be fixed by the extra programmers?

It's not like there's anything wrong with Linux right now.

[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Don't forget to look in which community this was posted

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Pppffbbbthhh haha thanks.

Guess I'll just sit in this, I guess.

[-] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I prefer Ruby myself 🥰

Joking, of course. Ruby would be slow as hell.

[-] christopher@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago
[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

i mean if you want chaos, program in whitespace

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
251 points (93.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

18207 readers
1432 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS