this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
333 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3177 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago (4 children)

On the one hand, this is long overdue.

On the other, I've always considered pardons to be insulting when they're being distributed to people on the receiving end of injustice, as accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt.

The US Government was guilty here.

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 51 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

In the legal sense, a pardon is not an admission of guilt (see #4 ), but socially it bears the resemblance of an admission by someone who has not yet been charged or convicted. Given that these folks were already found legally guilty of a “crime” that is no longer a crime, I don’t see how accepting a pardon is an admission of anything other than they had been wronged.

But I’m just some straight cis white dude in the internet and my feelings are not the ones that matter in this matter.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 22 points 4 months ago

What they ought to do is expunge the convictions and offer some form of recompense for the unjust treatment, but reparations aren't something our government wants to talk about.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 10 points 4 months ago

I've never really thought about it this way. Good point.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I didn’t read it. Did it clear the way for honorable Discharges?

If so that is good

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 10 points 4 months ago

Yes, but there is paperwork.

In order to get their records changed under the pardon, individuals will need to complete an online application, which will go to their military service department. The services will then review the individual’s court-martial and service record and determine if they are eligible for the pardon; that determination will then be sent to the attorney general, acting through the Department of Justice’s pardon attorney, a US official explained.

The certificate of pardon does not automatically change someone’s discharge status. If a certificate of pardon is issued, the service member will then have to apply to their respective military department’s board of corrections to have their military records corrected.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

A good move from Biden.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s about time to do this. It should have happened YEARS ago.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But he was waiting until June!

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The pardon, which CNN is first to report on, specifically grants clemency to service members who were convicted under former Uniform Code of Military Justice Article 125 — which criminalized sodomy, including between consenting adults — between 1951 and 2013 when it was rewritten by Congress.

A bad-conduct discharge, for example, given under general court-martial, can make someone ineligible for services including a VA home loan military pension, and education benefits.

The pardon is separate from the Pentagon’s ongoing review of military records for those who were discharged based on their sexual orientation, which one of the officials said did not apply to convictions under the UCMJ.

The Pentagon launched a new outreach campaign last September to reach more veterans who believe they “suffered an error or injustice” to have their military records reviewed.

“For decades, our LGBTQ+ service members were forced to hide or were prevented from serving altogether,” Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said at the time.

In order to get their records changed under the pardon, individuals will need to complete an online application, which will go to their military service department.


The original article contains 433 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago