491

Pete Buttigieg fact-checks a GOP congressman to his face at House hearing (www.lgbtqnation.com)

submitted 3 days ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago

“I’m wondering if there’s some point- if you’ve identified some point where you will stop, where the administration will stop, where the federal government will stop this requirement and let the market decide..."

Let the market decide? Sure let's do that. As of now, let's have the U.S. government stop subsidizing the oil industry to the tune of $20 billion+ per year and see who keeps buying gas powered cars when gas is $15-20 per gallon. Better still, pour that $20 billion into EV car development and green energy and help save the fucking planet.

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Better yet pour the 20billion into reliabke regional and long distance rail infrastructure.

[-] FiniteBanjo 22 points 2 days ago

For future readers, the quote in this comment is from GOP Representative Perry who was then immediately proven wrong by Buttigieg.

[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago

Let the market decide" is like saying "Let the intoxicated person drive the car."

[-] Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 days ago

not EVs. public transport. or at least mostly that and a little EVs

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Both, in particular, EV public transport. Something like this would be nice.

[-] force@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Do NOT use battery electric busses when you could use trolleybusses. Or even better, just use trams

That being said, anything is better than diesel busses

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Him or Bernie should have been president

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 19 points 2 days ago

He was kind of a wet paper sack sitting the primaries, if he'd come in with this energy he might've gotten somewhere.

[-] Maeve@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

They called him Mayo Pete for valid reasons, perhaps a refresher is in order.

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Miracle whip Pete?

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 157 points 3 days ago

Good. This is the kinda shit Dems should keep doing. It doesn't matter if it sounds petty, these assholes are a threat to our democracy, they should not be allowed to spew their lies without consequences. If the press refuses to do their job, it falls to whoever is closest to a Republican.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 66 points 3 days ago

Buttigieg should be front and center a lot. He's whip smart, a great speaker, and really relatable

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

Thank you, I’m so tired of this loyalty to decorum. Call them what they are, authoritarian regressives

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Christofascists

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Step 1: sell the press to the rich

Step 2: everything is shitty now, but why?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] ozoned@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

A lot of GOP voters don't really care about facts sadly. I've talked to some that insist Jan 6th wasn't an issue.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

A lot? Pretty much all of them. Look at how many lies trump said during the debate... they'll lie directly to their base and their base isn't even intelligent enough to question it.

[-] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 23 points 2 days ago

They even know they're being lied to, and still go along.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago

Because they somehow think the lying will benefit them and not the people they hate.

Predicting a republican's reaction to any issue is easy because they are all grifters.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

All of these hearings serve no purpose other than to give Congress people 4 minutes of time to create some sound bites for the campaign.

Questions are widely leading or very inaccurate or even just lies ... If they ask a question at all. Some just spout garbage for a few minutes.

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Not always. Both Trump's NY fraud conviction, and election interference (hush money) felonies came out of the Michael Cohen hearing, specifically from AOC questions.

Your overall point is absolutely correct, though. It's even more frustrating when it's easy to see how powerful these hearings can be.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago

It goes both ways, I'm sure Buttigieg is happy to be in the news

[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

If Biden gets replaced, please be Pete

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

the bar is so low. did everyone forget who this guy is?

[-] Liz@midwest.social 10 points 2 days ago

I shall never forget as long as I live. Katie Porter or AOC would be better choices.

[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

What are you referring to?

[-] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He's a milquetoast centrist moderate who will champion the same neoliberal policies that led us to this current state of crisis in America. He was also a proud McKinsey consultant and I think he worked with the CIA. During the election I thought his main issues were just not enough experience, though (he was just mayor of a small town basically). Social issue wise he's better than Trump still. Anyone is, though lol.

[-] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I would like a reminder as well

[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

People took campaign shitslinging to heart

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago

I just wish Mr. Buttigieg wasn't confined to such a low-stakes role in the administration. It's great that he gets the occasional moments like this, but he's not exactly being set up for a run at the Presidency in 2028.

[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 days ago

Dude's only 42. He's got plenty of time. Hell you can't even get elected these days if you aren't getting social security.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

I dunno if I'd consider Secratary of Transportation as a low stakes role, he's been out and about getting IIJA funds out across the country and there to present new rail, highway, air and marine infrastructure improvements.

Plus, if an unspeakable fate were to befall thirteen specific individuals, simultaneously rendering them unable to perform their duties, you'd have a President Buttigieg.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

central planning model and this dictatorial policy

Fuck you, Scott Perry.

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 21 points 2 days ago

Is it too late for him to replace Biden?

load more comments (16 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024

491 points (97.3% liked)

politics

18059 readers

3089 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News