this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
264 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3251 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 76 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well of course they're going to.

They've been blatantly backing Trump and the MAGA Republicans, and why wouldn't they?: They're ideological allies. They all want the same thing - moralistic and militaristic kleptocratic autocracies that will stand against the threat that progressivism poses to their unearned, undeserved and grossly destructive privilege.

It's not an accident that Tucker Carlson flew over to fellate Putin, or that Trump and the MAGA Republicans have undermined support for Ukraine at every turn, or that they've expressed increasing hostility toward NATO at every turn. As part of their fascist coup, the hard right wants to ultimately entirely switch sides - to ally with Russia and against Europe, since Russia represents everything they admire and Europe represents everything they hate.

Of course Russia is going to assist in that.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think it’s less about compatible ideologies and more about the intention to destabilize the west.

China and Russia know damn well that another Trump presidency will continue to drive America into the ground.

Considering they hate us this is their best move. They want us to crumble and Trump is our best bet for that.

A strong America is Russia and chinas biggest hurdle.

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

Considering they hate us this is their best move.

This is a super naive way of looking at geopolitics, especially regarding China. We are their biggest trade ally. If the US crumbles, both of our economies implode. Trump wants to put insane tariffs on our imports from China. An economically strong US is to China's benefit since we are their single biggest trade ally (comparable to the entire European Union, which includes major trade allies as well). A strong US is not "China's biggest hurdle."

Russia geopolitically benefits from Trump in power because, among other things, Trump is fine letting Russia continue to ravage Ukraine with war and wants to pull us out of NATO (or at least cut funding to it). We don't have strong trade relations with Russia so they aren't directly affected if we economically flounder (the weak trade relations is why the sanctions on Russia did basically nothing long-term; Russia was already doing very little trade with the US).

China is not interested in "destabilizing the west." They would obviously benefit from being the economic center of the world, but they get there via strong geopolitical and economic relations with other relevant countries (which means not trying to cause those countries to collapse). Russia has less incentive to avoid causing turmoil in the US and EU, but right now it would very directly benefit from a Trump presidency, which in this case would be the driver behind Russia's decision to help put Trump back in power.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 53 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump said on a news conference before the election, “Russia, if you’re listening — I hope you are able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. Let’s see if that happens.”

Russia released DNC emails the next day.

Russia is an enemy of America and democracy and is and has been actively trying to overthrow our country via info and cyber warfare.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Am I the only one that finds it strange that all this shit with Russian hacks and the fascist uprising in America started quickly after Snowden was given asylum there?

Let's not fool ourselves here...there is no way if you or I were Putin he'd be allowed to stay without some of that info.

I mean the guy could have picked quite a few other places to go after committing treason that had non-extradition treaties with the US but he didn't.

And now thru back channeled manipulation Donald shit-his-pants Trump was elected president with that stolen info

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It started with Bill Browder and the Magnitsky Act. The timelines are so close together that it’s hard to separate, but I think that the Magnitsky Act was when the real motivation came in on the Russian side, and Snowden (and any possible additional fuckin with they were able to do because of intel they gathered from him; I won’t say you are wrong) came afterwards, as their efforts were just first starting to gather momentum. But I definitely remember that as of Snowden getting asylum, they were already heavily actively engaged in ways to fuck with us, in a way I don’t think they were prior to 2012.

It’s sad and ironic and displeasing. The Magnitsky Act was a very rare instance of the US doing something on the world stage that really was motivated at least in part by simple concern for human rights. And we paid the biggest price for it - up to and including this present godawful clusterfuck of a well-funded and -equipped GOP explicitly trying to destroy America and making pretty good progress on it so far - far more than any consequences we ever face for doing our standard war criminal geopolitical evil.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago

Thank you for describing it! I actually just made a joke comment with a list and included that but wasn't sure if people even remembered what that was. Glad to see some remember!

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The dude sacrificed his comfortable life to tell us that the feds are violating the 4th amendment on a regular basis and you're calling him a traitor? Fuck you

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I’ll only speak for myself; I don’t think Snowden was a traitor. The guy’s a fuckin hero. That’s not mutually exclusive with maybe him having to give up some intel once he’s in the clutches of the Russian government with maybe not a lot of options that wouldn’t lead to some real bad shit for him.

I feel bad for the guy. He 100% did the right thing, knowing ahead of time that he would get fucked for it, and now he’s fucked and has powerful powerful enemies, and no friends who can make any difference for him. If anything I was saying sounded like I was agreeing he was a traitor, I was not.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Bro, the Patriot Act happened right after 9-11 and it was right in there plain as day that the gov't would be listening to the interet traffic of everyone to save us from turrists.

And way way before that Ma Bell was known for giving access to the gov't to listen in on phone calls. You think Snowden is some oracle on that front?

I never called him a trator, I merely said it's coincidental.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

You don't get it guys, there's literally no evidence that Russia likes Trump and wants Republicans to win! None! They never met with Russian operatives to discuss orphans (dropping the sanctions on Russia from the magnitski act, orphan exchange was retaliation from Russia)

There was never a young redhead Russian operative dating Republican politicians!

There was never a meeting between Trump and Putin where no US translators were allowed!

There was never an attempt to make a Trump Moscow hotel!

There was never a transaction between Paul Manafort and a Russian intelligence operative where he shared campaign information!

There was never a time that Trump said on a news conference before the election, “Russia, if you’re listening — I hope you are able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. Let’s see if that happens.” Russia never released the DNC emails the next day!

Sean Hannity yelled at me that Democrats are the ones helping Putin and they're the real Nazis so I believe it!

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Always include the /s because otherwise you sound like several batshit crazy relatives of mine that would froth at the mouth with all that and mean it.

We're in the alternate timeline.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah I basically channelled my father for that one lol Last time I saw him it was just a firehose of fox news talking points...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Donnie being supported by the Russians, is a feature, not a bug, since the cons think Russia is doing the right things when it comes to protecting whites, cishet, xtians, etc...

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago

It all depends on why you're talking about Russia.

Russia wants Trump to win: No! Fake News! He's the hardest on Russia, more than any president ever! The Democrats are the ones working for Putin!

Russia in general: Russia is a great country with a strong leader, it's good to see Republicans pushing to emulate that! Ukraine would have never been invaded if Republicans were in power!

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I suspect that we're seeing a lot of this on Lemmy already. I've started paying attention to usernames of those who post content, and have found that it's just a couple people posting the vast majority of hyper-critical anti-Biden content. These posts tend to get hundreds of upvotes without many comments. I remember seeing similar behavior on Reddit in the previous election cycle, and on 4chan in the election before that.

[–] auk@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago

I made !pleasantpolitics@slrpnk.net to test a new moderation approach which is designed to filter out a lot of the crap. I think you should try posting some articles there, and see whether you see the same hyper-critical anti-Biden content. I think I know what you're talking about, and I think the filtering bot will probably be able to detect and ban almost all of the users you're talking about.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I’ll wait to see what @JimSamtanko thinks before forming my opinion. /s

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, who could have guessed that.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Everyone.

Everyone could have guessed that. Remember: regardless of who the candidate is, blue no matter who isn’t just about democracy for the US. It’s for the entire world,

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Well, yeah. Putin's now so close to the power he's always craved that of course he's dedicating maximum resources to planting his puppet back in the Oval.

[–] StinkyOnions@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

With all those useful idiots demanding to step down.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

NO..... FUCKING........... WAY!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is my shocked face.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago

Yup. If people are frustrated with Joe Biden, They need to support BDS, No thanks, Goods Unite Us and Ranked choice.