this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
423 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5143 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 131 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Remember, people. Donald Trump couldn't run a casino.

A casino. A business that exists so people can just walk in and give you lots of money all for the hopes of maybe walking out with somewhat less money. And he failed. Six fucking times. He literally had thousands of people handing him money for nothing every single day and he still fucking failed.

That is a level of fail I did not think was achievable by a functioning human being allowed to go outside without adult supervision. But there are somehow 80 million people in this fucking country that know that and are still saying "Yep, that's our guy!"

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Donald Trump failed at selling gambling, alcohol, and steaks.

To Americans.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

It's already been proven that if Trump had simply done nothing but let the inheritance he got from his father collect interest, he would be significantly more wealthy than he is now.

Which means all he had to do was nothing. Nothing. And somehow, he failed at that. The man failed at doing nothing.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Benefit of the doubt here, weren't the casinos some criminal conspiracy to dodge taxes or sg?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, just good old failing at business.

He was super over-leveraged and fucked himself over.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 87 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Where the hell have they been? He's been unfit to lead since 2015.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He's less valuable to their bottom line now.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I take this as a sign that the swell of derision about their fawning attempts to shit on Biden with every minute of every working day has entered the mainstream and impinged on their consciousness

And, like a bunch of transparent dishonest hacks, they’re making the world’s most transparently dishonest hacky attempt to solve the problem

Great job guys, you’re gonna fool em with this one I think

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh shit we forget to both sides this, quick put out a editorial.

now back to bashing Biden.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a pointless thing to talk about because Trump's support is locked in and there's nothing anyone can do to push Trump out. His being unfit to lead is a feature to his supporters, not a bug.

There is, however, a slim chance that Biden may be able to be pressured out before august, so that's really the only thing people should be focusing on until the convention is behind us.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's silly. Trump has lots of "Locked In" support, but not enough to win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When has he ever been fit?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 months ago

Never which is sadly what qualifies him with the GOP

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Did they just figure that out? I was thinking that back in 2015

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He barely fits into people clothes.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He fit into the seat in Epstein's plane just fine though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taldennz@lemmy.nz 15 points 3 months ago

Pfft. He doesn't plan to lead, or to serve. He plans to rule.

[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I agree but who the fuck cares what the NY Times says nowadays.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

oh, gee, didn't their editor just say that advocating for or defending democracy was a partisan act, and that he wouldn't do it?

what's all this, then?

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Damage control for everyone who told Kahn he's an idiot.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I'm gonna bet the up vote/down vote ratio between this story and the other from NYT calling for Biden to step down will be wildly different

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I was just thinking that it’s nice to have a link to show that OP doesn’t exclusively post anti-Biden news

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 10 points 3 months ago

Almost as if there was a concrete objective difference between the two candidates that would impact people’s assessment

It is not partisan to say it would be bad for a rabid chimpanzee to run the hospital

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Saluting Republicans that it said “pursued electoral power in service to solutions for such problems”, such as Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush, John McCain and Mitt Romney, the Times board went on to say that “too many Republicans set aside their concerns about Mr Trump because of his positions on immigration, trade and taxes.

Trump was convicted on 34 criminal charges concerning hush-money payments to a porn star that a jury agreed were designed to interfere with the 2016 election.

Trump was impeached a second time for inciting an insurrection but Republican senators acquitted him, leaving him free to run for office.

Instead of a cogent vision for the country’s future, Mr Trump is animated by a thirst for political power: to use the levers of government to advance his interests, satisfy his impulses and exact retribution against those who he thinks have wronged him.

It added that while Democrats “are rightly engaged in their own debate about whether President Biden is the right person to carry the party’s nomination into the election, given widespread concerns among voters about his age-related fitness”, the importance of that debate was down to “legitimate concerns that Mr Trump may present a danger to the country, its strength, security and national character – and that a compelling Democratic alternative is the only thing that would prevent his return to power.

It said it was a “national tragedy that the Republicans have failed to … [set] aside their longstanding values” and ignoring what former Trump officials “have described as his systematic dishonesty, corruption, cruelty and incompetence”, and urged American voters to “perform a simple act of civic duty in an election year: listen to what Mr Trump is saying, pay attention to what he did as president and allow yourself to truly inhabit what he has promised to do if returned to office”.


The original article contains 779 words, the summary contains 308 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›