403
submitted 9 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/twoxchromosomes@slrpnk.net
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.ml 127 points 9 months ago

Gonna be a bunch of women in prison for this. That's wild.

[-] Chriszz@lemmy.world 122 points 9 months ago

It is absolutely bizarre to me, that we as a society will be taking away the freedom of select women and locking them away with actual criminals simply because they chose to act on their right to bodily autonomy.

[-] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 84 points 9 months ago

It’s bizarre to me that some women voted for this.

[-] gst0ck@lemm.ee 61 points 9 months ago

"I'll never need one." Until they do.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 9 months ago

And then they assume an exception has or will be there for them because theirs is morally justified because they’re good people, and everyone else is a sinner.

[-] Jeredin@lemm.ee 24 points 9 months ago

They never even take the time to consider the needs of the women within their own "tribe."  They are simply brainwashed.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

This, we like to talk about men making decisions on women's reproductive rights. But if it wasn't wasn't for women this wouldn't have passed.

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

If I wasn't for men it wouldn't have even been introduced or gained this momentum. If it wasn't for misogyny this wouldn't have passed.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

While there is a place for it, my issue with saying misogyny in this context is that it's a vague, loaded and nebulous term that people project their own meanings to and detracts from the nuances of the reasons that lead women to support anti abortion legislation in the first place. I don't think the sociological forces can simply be explained away by saying its misogyny, there are women that sincerely believe abortions are unethical.

[-] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It's not the belief that abortions are unethical that is misogynistic. It's the belief that your ethics on abortion give you the right to take away another person's right to make decisions about their body based on THEIR ethics, because they are women.

Don't believe me? Imagine a law that forces every healthy person to donate blood. Why does that sound ridiculous when the risks of blood donation are far less, and the number of lives it could save far higher? Or donating a kidney, which carries similar risk-per-life?

The answer: because it wouldn't only be women affected.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HyonoKo@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

Why, why, why…

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ScoobyDoo27@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago

Just like the war on drugs. We locked up so many people for smoking a joint or having a speck of cocaine on them. As if these are the people who are a danger to society (most of the time).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Autonomy is always at the discretion of rich old white men.

[-] helixdaunting@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

That's not 100% accurate. Some of them aren't rich, several of them aren't old, and a few of them aren't white.

[-] Buelldozer 12 points 9 months ago

The girl was 7 months pregnant at the time of abortion and they burned the body. This isn't normal at all.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

Which wouldn't have been necessary at all if Republicans weren't all up in her vagina in the first place.

[-] tastysnacks@programming.dev 20 points 9 months ago

Cremation isn’t unusual.

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

It will be.

[-] Vent@lemm.ee 95 points 9 months ago

Damn and Facebook ratted them out

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 59 points 9 months ago

That’s honestly one of the least surprising parts

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 43 points 9 months ago

Maybe all the "I have nothing to hide" folks will get why people were harping on privacy all these years.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 68 points 9 months ago

It seemed like society was slowly but surely moving forward overall then 2016 happened and everything went to shit. Just like everyone paying even a tiny amount of attention knew it would. Fuck this is sad.

[-] Flyingostrich@endlesstalk.org 12 points 9 months ago

It's been going downhill for a while now. Not just 2016 We just didn't notice.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

For me it started in 2001. The 90s were pretty rad.

[-] SpookyUnderwear@eviltoast.org 2 points 9 months ago

The 90s were the peak of our society (thus far). We could have been a little less homophobic, but besides that, things were pretty great.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] drdalek13@lemmy.ml 55 points 9 months ago

"Celeste Burgess was released from Madison county jail earlier this month, after serving a little more than half of her 90-day sentence, local Nebraska news outlet KTIV reported. At her sentencing, Celeste Burgess said that her family could not have afforded a funeral for fetal remains, according to Courthouse News. (In a financial affidavit obtained by Vice, Jessica Burgess said she had $400 to her name.) Celeste Burgess also reportedly deals with multiple mental health issues and became pregnant due to an abusive relationship.

Jessica Burgess was set to undergo a court-ordered psychological evaluation ahead of her sentencing. But the evaluation was canceled due to lack of funding, according to KTIV."

"Lack of Funding" is something I read far too often for this economy.

Wealth hoarding is going to cast the rest of us into abject poverty, and we can't really do anything about it. We live in a dystopian political drama, and it fucking BLOWS

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 31 points 9 months ago

They can skip psychological evaluations ordered by a court to ensure justice is done because the state doesn't have enough money, but if you're a poor woman who can't afford a funeral for something that was never a person, get fucked and go to prison.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 35 points 9 months ago

Court documents in the case revealed that Facebook’s parent company Meta supplied police with the private Facebook messages that Celeste and Jessica Burgess had sent one another.

She's in prison because Meta read their messages.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago
[-] Kekzkrieger@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago

one more reason to get off of any social media and especially meta

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

People should crowdfund an escape plan for that lady and deliver justice by keeping her free. Fuck the law if it's wrong.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 16 points 9 months ago

Welcome to Nebraska home of the evangelical grand inquisitor

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 14 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Jessica Burgess, a Nebraska mother accused of helping her teenage daughter use pills to end her pregnancy, was sentenced on Friday to two years in prison.

According to prosecutors, after the pair bought pills to end the pregnancy, Celeste Burgess gave birth to a stillborn fetus.

Jessica Burgess pleaded guilty in July to charges of false reporting, providing an abortion after 20 weeks of gestation, and concealing, removing or abandoning a dead human body.

Although the case occurred before the US supreme court overturned Roe v Wade, it has been seen as a harbinger of how law enforcement may prosecute people for ending their own pregnancies in a post-Roe era – and how giant tech companies could go along with it.

Celeste Burgess was released from Madison county jail earlier this month, after serving a little more than half of her 90-day sentence, local Nebraska news outlet KTIV reported.

Celeste Burgess also reportedly deals with multiple mental health issues and became pregnant due to an abusive relationship.


The original article contains 474 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

This is horrible. Any chance of this travesty getting appealed?

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago

Facebook "private" DMs. It's not just a theory, Orwell is here.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
403 points (97.4% liked)

TwoXChromosomes

1590 readers
2 users here now

About

A place for serious and silly content intended for women's perspectives. Yes, this includes ALL women. If you identify as a woman, you are welcome here.

(We are not the same mods as the Reddit r/twoxchromosomes sub)

Rules

We are currently following a modified version of r/TwoXChromosomes rules here.

Why THIS Community Name?

We chose this community name since it was already well established on Reddit. During the great Reddit migration of 2023 people were looking for the same or similar communities to what they had on Reddit, searching for names they already knew was the easiest way to get members. We have chosen to keep this name since it's well recognized. As stated above, ANY woman is welcome here.

Want to be a mod? Fill out our application!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS