this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
130 points (94.5% liked)

And Finally...

1827 readers
252 users here now

A place for odd or quirky world news stories.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse:

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seaside donkey proprietor John Nuttall has sparked debate by insisting children undergo a weight check before being allowed to ride his donkeys in Skegness. The 61-year-old has faced criticism for allegedly fat-shaming youngsters, yet many are applauding his decision.

With over four decades of experience providing donkey rides in Skegness and Cleethorpes, Nuttall has introduced a weight restriction to safeguard his donkeys in the face of increasing concerns about childhood obesity. He's set up weighing scales adjacent to his mobile paddock, complete with a sign detailing the requirements: under ten years old, shorter than 4ft 6ins, and lighter than six stone (38kg) for a £4 jaunt along the promenade.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That seems fair to the donkeys. Overloading pack animals is cruel to them and a serious issue. Humans have weight limits to what they can lift, so it seems right to recognize the animals limits.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are live animals. As long as he isn't mocking these children after they're weighed everyone can fuck off with the complaints.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

All he has to do is stop saying "nyah nyah, scram fattie!" and I'm fine with it. If he would just stop saying that part, I'd be fine with it.

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let's face it, the only people getting upset about this are the land-whales whose obese kids are everybody's fault but theirs

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, the guy hasn't "sparked debate". The single complainant cited is from some obesity alliance, who says it's wrong to weigh children in public.

OP SLAMMED for sharing poor quality news.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

It's like how America thinks Meghan Sussex/Markle sparked debate here when people didn't even care that much

[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Good for him honestly, he shouldn't subject his beautiful animal to weights that may be harmful to its body. If parents don't like it, then don't go to him.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

I would have expected the weight requirement, so they don't have to control the age and height. Interesting that they still have those...

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Boy that site is cancerous without ublock

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

That's Reach Plc for you.

Owns every regional news site in the UK. Seemingly publishes shit on random ones, like this which is Wales Online, but apparently fat kids on the opposite side of the country are considered newsworthy.

I'm just glad they got rid of the side swiping on articles, where a clumsy scroll would just load an entirely different page for no fucking reason.

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tall-shaming, too, tsk tsk

[–] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

and age-shaming.