this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
100 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10162 readers
79 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 9 points 11 months ago

Very interesting article that strikes that good balance between opinion and facts. I love when opinions are backed by quotes, history and something more tangible than "I think so". The title however doesn't match the content. I'd call it "Why the Super-Rich Want You Unemploymed". Or if you really want then it'd be fair to slap on the secret history on there to.

[–] Izzgo@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

The summary, yup:

The reality is that we have the tools to create a much better, richer society for everyone. But the people at the top would prefer a worse, poorer country, if that’s what’s required for them to stay completely in charge.

[–] sandriver@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Also of note is that the UN OHCHR is also bluntly critical of austerity as a human rights abuse, due to the way it targets minority groups: https://www.ohchr.org/en/social-security/austerity-measures-and-right-social-security

Not mentioned is the way it helps established disabled people as a permanent underclass. We are simply less than human. In Australia, the more disabled you are, the more you're exposed to being killed or maimed in an institution, or slightly "better" winding up homeless and exposed to violence and other crimes (if your state likes packing people into shelters like sardines) or the elements (if they don't).

[–] shellieg@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

That's such a fascinating read. Love how someone predicted that behaviour so long ago, although I would be interested to see if there are modern studies that help understand why that's the reaction. I did see Tim's comments and was reminded CEOs have more similarities to psychopaths than the average population because his position was so unempathetic.