this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
154 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59711 readers
1817 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 100 points 3 months ago (4 children)

So, wading in here with a gut reaction and no nuance, he's charged with all these crimes because the platform he runs has them being organized between its users?

Who do we arrest if a crime is organized via phone call on T-Mobile's network, or via mail?

Is it a case of cooperation, where Telegram is completely refusing to help, or is it just a case of "encryption bad, privacy bad" from the French government?

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 60 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who do we arrest if a crime is organized via phone call on T-Mobile’s network

I guarantee you, T-Mobile does not hesitate to hand over any and all data they have to the government. And they don't encrypt shit, as evidenced by their many many data breaches.

or via mail?

The postal service is from a different era, and has legal protections I wish online equivalents had. Logically they should. Realistically they probably never will.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 12 points 3 months ago

In Germany those leagacy protections have long been breached

[–] funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A service provider is not responsible for the content people publish on their service. But if they knowingly allow criminals to publish and refuse to cooperate with courts and police, they become responsible.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But the level of cooperation required means they have to break eee to remain in the clear. Doing that means they lose almost all reason to exist in the first place. This is a no-win scenario.

[–] Pieresqi@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What e2ee ? Telegram group chats are not encrypted.

[–] HarriPotero@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Telegram chats are encrypted. (in transport)

Only "secret chats" are fully e2ee, though.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is it a case of cooperation, where Telegram is completely refusing to help, or is it just a case of "encryption bad, privacy bad" from the French government?

On the same disclaimer, I'm betting on the latter.

[–] themarty27@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Allegedly the former. By "allegedly", I mean that Telegram is definitely uncooperative in moderation of illegal content, the alleged part is that that is the motivation behind the arrest. I also read somewhere that he was accused of tapping into Macron's manager's communications, but I can't find the article and I don't know how reliable that statement is.

[–] THX1138@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago

also read somewhere that he was accused of tapping into Macron’s manager’s communications, but I can’t find the article and I don’t know how reliable that statement is.

So in turn... your comment is just as unreliable.

[–] 1984 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know anything about this but when USA calls someone a terrorist, it's always about money or power in some form.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

In this case it was France, not the USA.

You do agree that America bad though, right?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Do you think those racist colonizers are any different from usa? Do you think they use the term "terrorism" fairly and objectively? Not at all.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The lengths that the military surveillance state will go to in order to invade our invade our privacy. This has nothing to do with terrorism, fraud or child porn, this is 100% him not allowing back doors to his app.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This has nothing to do with privacy either. First of all Telegram is not a private messenger. Secondly, this is a about public forums and groups called Channels. This has nothing to do with backdoors eithe. They are simply asking them to do moderation on chats they already have access too.

Telegram has full access to this data and knowingly ignores child pornography and other criminal activity. If Facebook did such a thing for years you'd be screaming right now.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I haven't seen CP on either platform. How are you sure there is CP in telegram? How do you know there isn't on Facebook?

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I think we all know that it has definitely appeared on both platforms. I think it's a case of "what did the company do about it?"

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So they're saying this guy is a terrorist, drug trafficker, money launderer, pedo?

It sounds like a reasonable list of crimes with solid evidence. \s