this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
407 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3859 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Readers needed to know that, when you visit Arlington, you might not know exactly what you’re supposed to do when confronted by those rows of headstones, but you damn sure know what you’re not supposed to do. But the coverage this week left many readers with the impression that the whole thing might have been a bureaucratic mix-up, or some tedious violation of protocol. It focused on bland horse-race coverage so common during election season, rather than clearly stating what really took place: an egregious and willful violation of long-standing norms. What was missing from the coverage was a willingness to quickly and decisively state what a grievous insult the whole debacle was to the dignity of Arlington. The sacred had been profaned.

Well fucking said.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 156 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't handle it? They refused to. As always, the shit stain is greased through and receives no consequences for what anyone else would be thrown down for. This fuckstain continues to make a mockery of everything while we watch.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 80 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He could shit on the flag, and they would wipe his ass with it.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then turn around and say Kamala has gotten shit all over the american flag.

[–] Linktank 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"How could she let this happen!?"

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

"Why won't Kamala lead?"

That's what they said about Obama all the time when the Republican Party was basically shitting into their own hands and flinging it at Democrats and the American people: "why won't Obama lead?"

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

(to paraphrase Bill Maher:)

"They'd blame the flag."

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

uh... you might want to brush up on your Bill Maher lore. he's not only conservative, but has been acting like a creep lately. like, weird with children kind of creep.

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I saw some of that video.

It's also sad.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 93 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The media is pro-Trump, not only because they are wealthy capitalists who agree with his deregulation policies and tax cuts for the rich, but also because they get higher ratings when the masses are angry. Just look at how CNN changed; they might as well just be another pro-Trump network.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Just look at how CNN changed; they might as well just be another pro-Trump network.

Ownership of CNN changed hands a couple of years ago:

"But the bigger question floating over one of the world’s largest and most important news organizations is why it’s changing. Is it because the CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, its new owner, wants an overhaul? Or is it at the behest of a conservative billionaire investor in the company who sits on its board?" source

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 77 points 2 months ago (1 children)

an egregious and willful violation of long-standing norms

Even that's giving him too much credit. He broke the law.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 54 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If Harris did something inappropriate at a cemetery, there’d be a nonstop drumbeat from them questioning if she should stay in the race.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Correct. If Biden did something like it, they'd blame it on mental decline and do the drumbeat....but yeah, if it's a Republican, it's OK, because they already have too many things in the Republican column, and they need to be "objective" by downplaying things in this column and seek things in the Democratic column and play those way up (like Walz leaving the National Guard, for instance, I mean, WTAF).

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I'll say this much - so far, I've not seen one article that deals with this AT ALL in pretty much the only paper for the Colorado area: Denver Post.

And it's a huge scandal. As so many things related to donOLD, this would have sunk any candidate decades ago. It doesn't even get proper coverage now.