this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
153 points (99.4% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2235 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Jas Athwal, the newly-elected MP for Ilford South, owns 15 rental flats, but some tenants have claimed they regularly have to clean their bathroom ceilings to remove mould.

In an investigation first reported by the BBC, one tenant in a block of seven flats in Seven Kings, Redbridge, said "there are ants everywhere" including on their child's body and clothes.

Responding to the investigation, Mr Athwal said he was "shocked" to hear of the reported condition of his properties, adding that they were managed by an agency which did not communicate any problems back to him.

Formerly the leader of Redbridge Council, Mr Athwal is also required to have a selective property licence in order to rent out the block of seven flats - a system he introduced in 2017 when he was in charge of the council.

It comes after the BBC found the council's public licence register indicated that none of the seven properties had a licence.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 61 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Every politician in every nation should be banned from owning rental income units.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Every politician in every nation should be banned from having any side business or income of any kind, including after retirement, to avoid potential conflicts.

(E.g. an MP being offered a paid seat on a Landlord's Association for when they retire, which would conflict woth their duty to serve the people whilst an MP)

The government income and pension should be enough to live on so that these issues can be avoided.

If you want to become a public servant, that's a high calling that you undertake to serve your nation, and there are some small sacrifices that should come with it.

It should NEVER be a potential avenue for fame or riches. It should be a sacrifice you make to serve the people and country you care deeply for.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ah so only rich people can ever be politicians as everyone else simply can't afford it.

[–] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did you read their entire comment?

The government income and pension should be enough to live on so that these issues can be avoided.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So how do you stand for election with no income for months on end?

[–] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One option is to publicly fund candidates equally. In such a system someone could apply to run for a position, the position would require a specified amount of people to nominate that person, if that person is nominated they get a grant that covers their campaign costs. The amount wouldn't be excessive so campaigns would look very different than they do now in places like the US.

Another option is to limit campaign donations from any individual to $100 total. This would force politicians to put effort into building a grassroots campaign while keeping big moneyed interests out of the process.

When politicians get into a position of power, they should be paid enough that they're firmly in the upper middle class, so they're comfortable and less likely to accept bribes, and they should not be given any opportunity to accept bribes or profit off of their position in any way.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not campaign costs that are the issue. You're working full time on a campaign, you really have to quit or take six weeks off with your boss being ok with you never coming back.

Many people work jobs where this would be seen as a great thing for the firm, many do not

[–] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Potentially losing your job would be part of the risk/sacrifice a potential candidate would have to accept. Yes, it would be difficult for someone living paycheck to paycheck to do this. Ideally, election reform like this would go hand in hand with economic reform that leads us to a society in which much less people are living paycheck to paycheck. This could happen easily if we start electing real people instead of rich people only.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It would skew it even more to rich people. Since... you know... everyone else has to work.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

It wouldn't be Britain if rich assholes didn't end up becoming MPs.

[–] maniii@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You'll find that "student accomodations" are probably the biggest scams in the UK. A lot of Indian-origin residents/citizens esp. the first-generation, they have the same "Indian" mentality. You'll find that the 2nd-gen children of these people are more "British" and less "Indian" mindset.

Case in point, the elderly property owner does less than the "minimum" maintenance, charges crazy rent-prices, re-arranges rooms to fit the maximum occupants, almost regular issues like heating, plumbing, mold, etc completely ignored. While suddenly announcing that rent is increasing by 20% "due to inflation, or needed for maintenance" ... don't pay? get out and your deposit is forfeit. Ever showered in cold water during the entire February in the UK ?

You will find that the 2nd-gen children if they find out the elder is doing this, will immediately rectify the situation and probably takeover if they can. Else you are outta luck and on your bum in the middle of winter which no one will want to be.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There are 85 UK MPs who own rental properties and not all of them are of Indian descent. Source

Greed is not defined by race.

Edit -- I see the racists are out in full force today.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The mold definitely should be fixed.... But are ants not a tennant problem, not a landlord problem?

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

It really depends. One tenant could have an ant problem because another adjacent tenant is attracting them, which the landlord needs to address. If the structure has decaying wood, that can attract carpenter ants which is a landlord issue. Some ants like humid environments, so a poorly ventilated structure (like one with mold) could be the cause--also the landlord's problem.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

In the states, a significant bug infestation of any kind is a landlord problem.