this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
26 points (72.4% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3735 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 28 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

How in the hell would anarchy and fascism ever become one? They're like polar opposites.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Horseshoe Theory believers tend to be fond of libertarian-authoritarian axis erasure, so they think the opposite of fascism is Stalinism instead.

And yeah, auth-right dictatorships and auth-left dictatorships are indeed pretty damn similar, so they'd have a point... if their premise weren't unfounded to begin with.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It’s more that when you become very extreme, the methods become similar regardless of the underlying politics.

From observation, centrists don’t mind horseshoe theory but further right or left people become enraged when someone brings it up.

[–] essell@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

Philosophically, sure.

In action and presentation, there's overlaps in outcomes

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

The idea of a political center is a reification of the spectrum political model. These people aren't centrists because they've formed a ideology, they're centrists because they accept convention like an RPG player who takes the default hero and skips character creation.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

internet hiccup; triple posted 😮‍💨

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

The Conversation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Conversation:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - Australia
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://theconversation.com/are-the-far-left-and-far-right-merging-together-thats-what-the-horseshoe-theory-of-politics-says-but-its-wrong-234079
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support