this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
103 points (89.9% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Odd, one would think he would find kinship with other blood sucking nuisances.

But I guess they aren't corrupt enough for him.

He hates competition

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

They haven’t gone bankrupt enough times

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think his anti-Mosquito stance is the only reasonable position on an issue he has ever taken.

[–] astrsk@fedia.io 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It may just be his only concrete stance period. Wishy Washy Donny aiming to be the peace candidate while threatening to execute minorities and immigrants.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He'd just promise to jail any mosquito that bites someone, which is misogynist, in a way.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] elbucho@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I suppose the title isn't exactly misleading, but it certainly left me with the impression that he had another sundowning moment where he gets off on a tangent and then a tangent to that tangent, and never gets back to the original point.

This wasn't that. He was talking shit, obviously, but his drivel contained cogent points. It's probably the most coherent I've seen him be in the last year or two. While he was speaking (and making one coherent point), he was interrupted by a mosquito, and then took a moment to mention how much he hates mosquitoes. Then, and this is the important bit, he went back to his original point. Everybody does this. Usually, it's nothing more than just waving your hand around in front of your face and saying: "fucking mosquitoes!", but it's the same general principle nonetheless.

Contrast this with his whole shark / boat / battery scenario. Or his long, rambling diatribe about how powerful "nuclear" is. This is nothing.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

This is why they should drug test before the debate. I'd love to read the perscription list they have him on. "annnnd number 233 is Adderall"

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 1 points 2 weeks ago

Like actually shitting? Poop shitting?

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

There was a pile of dead mosquitos on the floor beneath where he was standing. Looking at them under a microscope they appeared to have died in agony.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Demento Don talking incoherent shit again...

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Is this why he needs JD as an intermediary to garner the "full-throated" endorsements of the adrenochrome brothers, Peter Theil and Elon Musk?