this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
873 points (97.9% liked)

memes

10206 readers
2645 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Harder to hit when the button is in retrograde too.

[–] SouravSatvaya@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

On full screen ad everything is clickable except the close button.

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Miss and it's opening a link to somewhere you don't want to go, like waking up the fucking google play store you had hibernated for a reason!!!

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago

Theres a special place in hell for mobile ad designers. They're honestly borderline scams at this point.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 16 points 2 months ago

I remember first getting my S10e and literally every close window button was behind the camera lens. there's no way it wasn't on purpose.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

perhaps we're too ublock origin-pilled to relate to it

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Only thing worse is trying to read the rest of a long YouTube comment without making the app think you want to reply instead of read it.

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

It's easy, they decided to wrap the button to be tight to the text itself, instead of a small rectangular area, so just aim for one of the letters and hope you didn't accidentally hit the negative space inside one of them.

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'd recommend using uBlock with Firefox and/or Librewolf

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

uBlock Origin, not the fake uBlock.

[–] SouravSatvaya@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (7 children)

What about in app ads? Especially the full screen ads on mobile apps.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

If you're on Android, go to settings and network, find and enable private dns mode using this host address

dns.adguard-dns.com

It should block the majority of ingame/inapp ads, etc

Edit: Minor Caveat. This isn't fool proof nor is it 100% effective.

But takes you all of 30 seconds and does not require root permissions, side loaded apps, etc. Its all about the cost benefit ratios.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

I have pihole for DNS blocking. Unfortunately, many apps fall back to advertising their premium plans which is just as annoying and far more repetitive (looking at you, Duolingo).

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The more direct approach if you're rooted: use App Manager, find your app, click the "X trackers" button in the header and if you still see adverts, look for any activities, services, receivers, that look like ads (usually highlighted).

For example (german):

There's also Warden, which can do the same but more simplified. They use both Exodus Privacy.

They both edit the app directly, without any background services or VPNs.

[–] KillerTofu@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

alternative to the already proposed solution is using adaway.

its obviously better if you are rooted but it runs well on unrooted phones too.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Don't use apps with ads. F-droid exists

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I regret to say that I don't know a solution for that; maybe someone here will know better if it's possible to block built-in ads

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[–] brb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Adaway if your phone is rooted. Pihole or dns adblocking otherwise

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

ads in Windows

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Never click the X on ads - it's just click bait. Get a proper adblock instead.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yup! A lot of them use that X as a link, or a download button. Stupid-ass Musk changed Twitter's logo to an X, and placed it on the top right of embeds, just so he can trick people into clicking it, which links to their website.

[–] flipflop97@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I signed up for Mullvad and it’s worth it. Super cheap and no data tied to you.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have some bad news for you if you think that simply using a VPN blocks Google and Facebook from being able to identify you.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My identity comment was tied to Mullvad itself. They don’t require any identifying information when signing up. For the kind of protection you’re talking about, yeah you’re gonna have to go further than just a VPN. Their fingerprinting capabilities are ridiculous.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, yup! Mullivad is pretty badass like that. You can mail them cash in an envelope and they'll add it to your subscription. Haha. Almost unheard of in today's society.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 2 points 2 months ago

Lmao that is wild. I’ve tried a couple others and Mullvad has been my favorite so far.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Any ideas for ad blockers that work with a blacklist rather than the contrary?

I don't want to harm the revenue stream of websites I visit unless their ads are unacceptable. So I want it not blocking ads by default. But I'd really like a way to block the website-breaking ads at Fextralife Elden Ring wiki. That shit is crazy; it breaks the search bar until EVERY ad (including autoplay video, even though I disabled autoplay video in settings) has fully loaded.

I do almost all of my browsing with Firefox for Android.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wish I could remember the name of an extension I had on my old computer.

It hid all ads, but also clicked them all in the background. It accomplished 4 goals:

  1. I didn't see the ads
  2. The websites I visited made more money through the clicks
  3. It cost the advertisers money
  4. It made the cost/benefit worse for advertisers since they were paying for clicks without anyone being influenced by the ads
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CynicusRex@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don’t want to harm the revenue stream of websites

Perhaps if a product cannot survive without ads it has grown too large or just isn't that necessary? I too could be making extra by creating content and throwing ads on it, but it's not ethical so I don't. Humanity should always strive towards a utopia and a utopian society has zero ads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Just dealing with this tonight!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right-click, block element.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Firefox/Mull with uBlock Origin, yeah. Well, there you have to use the element picker.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I cannot figure out how to exit that mode after activating it, and going back or refreshing resets it.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I'm actually talking about the element zapper mode, not the element picker mode. How do you use the element picker to remove something? Are you talking about creating a filter for something you select?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes? Isn't the zapper the same, except without dialogue?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

There doesn't seem to be a way to exit the zapper mode in Firefox Android.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

There have been some that have the x out of bounds

load more comments
view more: next ›